President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Ladies and gentlemen, friends. I would like to sincerely welcome all the participants of the Russia-Latin America International Parliamentary Conference.

This conference, initiated by the leaders of the Russian State Duma, has brought together representatives of legislative bodies and leaders of political parties, heads of public organisations, experts and diplomats from most Latin American countries.

A group of high-ranking legislators from Latin America, the people who represent their constituents and who are called upon to serve their interests, has arrived in Moscow. This again confirms that their nations are willing to develop a comprehensive mutually beneficial partnership with Russia. We are convinced that promoting direct dialogue between parliaments will open up opportunities for deepening our cooperation and expanding it through new areas of joint activity.

The State Duma speaker informed me about the conference’s large and very busy programme yesterday. I am sure you will have a rewarding time at the sessions and round tables discussing the role of parliamentary diplomacy in strengthening cooperation between Russia and Latin American countries across the board: in politics and security, as well as socioeconomic and humanitarian spheres.

Let me note that Russia’s and Latin America’s views on international issues traditionally have a lot in common. Latin Americans have always strived for independence, and the history of your continent is full of the most notable examples.

This happened during the period of struggle against colonialism during the time of the famous Simon Bolivar, who became a symbol of freedom not only for Latin America, but perhaps for the entire world and for all humanity. This also happened in the second half of the last century, when the continent gave the world such selfless fighters for justice and social equality as Salvador Allende, Ernesto Che Guevara, and Fidel Castro.

(Applause.)

I have to say that this applause is appropriate, as they say; it is applause that speaks to the role of those people whom I have just named. I remember my meetings with Fidel Castro, there were several of them. That was a rock, you know? That was a man who thought about people every second, and not only about the Cubans: he thought about all of Latin America, he thought about all the people on planet Earth. And indeed, his entire being was imbued with concern for achieving the common good and justice. He had a unique personality. These are the kind of people Latin America gives birth to.

It would not be an exaggeration to say that even today Latin American countries are showing a pattern in the success of the progressive process of forming a multipolar system of international relations based on equality, justice, respect for international law and each other’s legitimate interests.

In this new polycentric architecture, countries of Latin America, that have enormous economic potential and human resources and want to pursue a sovereign, independent foreign policy, will have a leading role in the world. There is no doubt about it.

Russia sincerely wishes the countries of the Latin American region to develop progressively and dynamically and strengthen their positions in the world economy and politics. We have always advocated for Latin America, in its unity and diversity, to be strong, independent and successful.

In order to achieve this, we are ready to build bilateral relations as well as work closely with integrational associations of Latin America, such as the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America, and the Southern Common Market. In particular, we will help ensure that these associations establish practical ties with the Eurasian Economic Union and compare approaches on current issues of trade policy, tariff regulation, stimulating investment, and technology transfer.

Of course, Russia is happy that there are countries in Latin America, which plan to join BRICS as full members or partners.

You know, departing from the text of my speech, I can say this: we have information and understanding of what is happening in different Latin American countries, while different political forces take different approaches to the associations I mentioned, including to the process of joining BRICS. We know this and we are aware of different trends within different political circles, particularly ahead of various political events inside these countries. However, BRICS is an organisation which is not a military alliance but rather a forum for coordinating approaches and developing mutually acceptable solutions based on sovereignty, independence and respect for one another.

My strong belief is that whatever is taking place within political circles and political parties in the countries which are on the way to joining or have joined or are seeking to join and work with these organisations, including BRICS, no matter what, all political forces will have to factor in people’s sentiments. Voters’ sentiments, in the broad sense of the word, in all Latin American countries add up to the aspiration for freedom and independence. All countries and political parties in Latin America will have to keep this in mind. This means that, of course, we will cooperate strategically, including on the issues which are key on the BRICS agenda.

Why am I speaking about this? The reason is that the BRICS Chairmanship will pass on to Russia soon and I believe we will do the utmost to make sure that the so-called global majority has the sense that they are not simply the majority in terms of the population size of their countries but they are the majority on account of their development prospects.

(Applause.)

As for our relations with Latin American countries, I would like to specially mention several things that are of priority importance. These relations are, first of all, friendly, constructive and mutually beneficial, and they develop on the basis of equality and respect for each other’s interests.

Over the previous five years, trade between Russia and Latin America has increased by 25 percent. Russia’s exports have climbed by 130 percent and include goods that are needed by Latin American countries, such as wheat, fertilisers, oil products and many other essential goods. These are our traditional markets. Of course, a faster transition to settlements in national currencies, and the creation of channels for financial and banking cooperation, as well as of new transport and logistics chains – all this facilitates the further development of mutual trade.

  • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, i mean it should be pretty obvious that this sort of rhetoric coming from Putin is just opportunism because he knows it’s the best way to appeal to independence minded forces in Latin America. But regardless it’s a good thing to have the head of state of a superpower openly hold up socialist revolutionaries as national, anti-colonial heroes. We have been saying for a long time that the Kremlin has been forced essentially against its will into becoming one of the main drivers of contemporary anti-imperialism, and the Russian bourgeois elites must be very uncomfortable at having to do this and to adopt this sort of rhetoric, but they have been left no other choice and that is a good thing. It doesn’t mean they won’t continue to behave as reactionaries domestically, and the rejection of Lenin is the final barrier of protection they have against a complete rehabilitation of progressive socialism.

      • lil_tank@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given his past record of trying to get into NATO and the EU I would say that his anti-imperialism is “opportunity-driven”, and not “oppotusitic” in the Lenin sense, as you rightly mentioned. He is an anti-communist pragmatist who knows that the Russian bourgeoisie has nothing to gain trying to befriend the West.

        • CamaradaD@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          After getting turned down so many times - and having NATO encroach upon Russia and treat them as enemies even with all his attempts to collaborate with them in the 90s and 2000s, I’d argue that he realized there is nothing to be gained in that field. So might as well try to get closer to the other people rejected by the West. Even if it means befriending commies in the international politics field.

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right, the word “opportunist” is not quite the correct term to use here, but nonetheless we can see an interesting contradiction. We hear how positively the Kremlin speaks of anti-imperialist and anti-colonial movements abroad (and to give credit where credit is due they also follow up their rhetoric with a lot of good actions toward building up the global south and helping it resist imperialism) while being very negatively inclined toward Lenin and the early Bolsheviks, and generally ambivalent about Stalin who on the one hand they portray positively for having led the country to victory in the Great Patriotic War but on the other hand still clinging to a good number of anti-Stalin myths and atrocity propaganda narratives fabricated during the Khrushchev era and popularized during Perestroika.