Or he believes people should be gendered according to their sex…

Bad. They’re bad.

Is this supposed to be pro socialism?

NATO can’t suffer a devastating defeat because it isn’t at war.

Pretty cool. The emblem is a little complex (but looks cool, so whatever), and the lack of geometry in the blue river is frustrating, but it’s overall cool looking.

I know enough (thanks to everyone who kindly replied) to know that everyone in the world save for those directly involved in the court case can safely assume Trump wanted a loan when he a applied for a loan. Sure, it’s an important step for the lawyers, but it’s so obvious that it’s only newsworthy if they couldn’t establish it.

The article is a waste of time.

Of course? That’s why he was talking the the lenders in the first place. He was trying to get a loan. If he intentionally falsified the information is another question, but of course he was trying to get a loan.

So, is all of attack on titan out? I can finish it?

Whoever wrote this is extremely bad at writing articles. The way the language is used is confusing, repetitive, and lacks any sort of logical flow.

That’s actually where democracy came from. When guns came along, it became extremely cheap and easy to turn every random peasant into a soldier. This meant that you essentially always had to have the will of the people on your side.

Except the big bang is the start of both space and time, so nothing in the universe could be older than the universe because there’s no time to speak of (not to mention the space for it to exist).

The moment after the big bang is called the Planck epoch. I just learned this from Wikipedia “In this stage, the characteristic scale length of the universe was the Planck length, 1.6×10−35 m, and consequently had a temperature of approximately 1032 degrees Celsius. Even the very concept of a particle breaks down in these conditions. A proper understanding of this period awaits the development of a theory of quantum gravity.”. I don’t really understand this, but it seems the early universe wasn’t conducive to particles. Even if it was, they wouldn’t be atoms. They’d just be quarks.

All of our physics breaks down at the singularity before the big bang, so assuming quarks that are around today existed then is just that, an assumption.

Photons are an exception (at least, in as much as that they are a particle), and you can make new particls from energy, but definitely there’s a limit to how old a particle can be. No particle is older than the universe (as far as the big bang is concerned).

How dare JonTron test on poor, defenseless, innocent animals!

We’ll never forget him.

Even ones that actively celebrate rape and murder? Even ones that will oppress women?

Does this even count as a ‘progressive’ movement if it institutes an intensely religious dictatorship?

That’s the biggest barrier to peace then. The whole article’s a waste of time without that bit.

Anyone know what Hamas says? Do they say they want peace between them and Israel?

AI ought to be called abominable intelligence/abominable intellect.

Doesn’t Hamas explicitly want to kill every Jew? If you’re after peace between Palestine and Israel then that’s great, but it does sound more like you’re arguing for genocide.

If you’re worried about Gaza’s self suffiency and independence, shouldn’t you be arguing for Palestine to have defensive capabilities, not the defeat of Israel?

I’ve been researching what’s going on, and I have a question for you guys (I might make a post asking this later, but not atm).

If Israel wanted a Palestinian genocide, wouldn’t it have already happened? Israel has decisively won nearly every war they’ve been in, and their defense systems are far more expensive than the offensive systems used against them (at least in the case of the iron dome).

I’m willing to believe stuff like Israel baited an attack from Hamas for an excuse for genocide, but why only now?