Howdy! Your local Albertan, hoping to get acquainted here with others on Lemmy.ca.

Feel free to connect with me elsewhere here: https://linkstack.lgbt/@binzyboi

Downvotes don’t make you right, if you disagree with me engage with the points I make and change my mind.

  • 191 Posts
  • 202 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 31st, 2025

help-circle






  • Imma say it.

    Drugs should be legalised. All of them.

    People should be free to do as they want with their bodies so long as the substances are regulated. By legalising drugs, you accomplish endless positives:

    • You ensure the product people buy is pure and not laced with unwanted substances (especially regarding heroin which is often laced with fentanyl)
    • You take away demand from the black market, and thus also deal a blow to organised crime
    • People that are curious in trying these drugs have the chance to do so with relative safety
    • The government can regulate limits on how much can be sold at a time and the maximum quantities of packages/doses
    • Additional cash flow in the economy much like we saw from legalising cannabis
    • More direct assistance to those addicted to drugs by leading them to resources to kick their habits. A regulated market ensures those already under the influence can’t purchase until they’re sober, unlike the unregulated black market where addiction is seen as a positive due to repeat customers.
    • Added freedom of bodily autonomy. If I want to try cocaine or heroin once assuming a relatively safe environment to do so, that should be my right.
    • You can prevent the spread of bloodborne diseases by giving clean needles with the product for injected substances.

    This is all a net positive. Where people see legalisation as the seeds of drug anarchy, it’d actually be the opposite, regulating the problem and thus decreasing the harms to the public caused by an unregulated market that faces a cruel cycle of addiction and incarceration.





















  • If I’m going to be completely fair, I’ve always mainly seen those as targeted for American audiences rather than towards Alberta.

    Like you know what I mean, always thought of that as “oh, let’s make this out to be bigger than it is so we can sell it for a quick buck to the MAGA crowd” rather than as something they actually wanted to set a narrative on.

    Guess those lines have kinda blurred since it’s become two of the same these days just about, so fair point.




  • Tell me you don’t know Alberta’s history of separatist sentiments without saying it explicitly.

    Can we stop pretending this is a foreign astroturf? As someone living in Calgary, this is a very real thing here that people genuinely believe, with some having thought this for decades.

    All the evidence is right in front of people’s eyes with Wexit parties being a not-so-distant memory to name the most recent example, and yet we jump to “Russia” or the U.S. as if they’re the main reasons these sentiments exist.

    If someone talks about “foreign astroturfing” then give me evidence rather than hit me with this “hunch” people seem to purely base this off.


  • Continue going against Bernie. He still won’t call what’s happening in Palestine a genocide because he’s such a coward. Not that long ago he had pro-Palestine protestors removed from an event of his for unfurling the Palestinian flag, all this despite the crowd chanting “free Palestine”.

    If you’re not calling it what it is, all you are is an enabler. I used to look up to the guy but his shameful unwillingness to use “the g word” only turns supporters away from him. Not calling it a genocide is a non-starter when every single fact points to that being the case. People aren’t blind, and this weakness from Bernie on this critical issue has made him lose countless supporters, of which who knows how many left politics altogether and stayed at home during the election as a result.

    You either keep up the pressure, or find someone else willing to tell things as they are. If Bernie is so scared of stating facts on a human rights issue, then who’s to take his word that he’ll fight for anybody’s human rights if push truly comes to shove?

    If Jamaal Bowman didn’t pull that damn fire alarm, he’d be a perfect example of someone (formerly) in office to look up to. In terms of commentators, been feeling homeless and left the U.S. sphere since Kyle Kulinski went radio silent in terms of a response to him saying it’s okay to deadname Caitlyn Jenner over her politics.



  • That’s not what I’m saying and you know you’re misconstruing what I’m saying here.

    “Oh no, the economy’s in a downturn, thousands of people are losing their jobs, but let’s make an article about how that negatively affects Taylor Swift”

    “New disease killing millions claims life of Ben Shapiro”

    I’m not saying “this has happened to people before, suck it up buttercup”, I’m saying of all the people this is sadly happening to, this is the guy I care about the least. Replace Hasan with Alex Jones and tell me you’d give half a shit in comparison to anybody else facing this.






  • I agree to an extent, but regardless, editing 7-8 videos taking hours of work should be paid. That this wasn’t until he went to the community’s subreddit about it is ridiculous. Video editors doing work for you is something that should by default be seen as paid work, you’d be hard-pressed to find someone to do it voluntarily.

    The guy shouldn’t have made the assumption he had an editor position in the bag and that this was a guarantee, but Hasan having received and published this work shouldn’t have assumed it to be free cause nobody does that. It’d be a completely different story if Hasan never published the edited vids.