Never happened, also it was just a few thousand, also they were kulaks and Ukrainians did it anyway. But also never happened, western propaganda. And what about NATO bombing Belgrade?!?!?!?!
- 0 Posts
- 226 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 27th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
21·3 days agoAh well, that too :D multiple bad guys can coexist, unfortunately.
Hey don’t get me wrong, I don’t like dead people (me very much included) any more than you do.
But yes, I think that a few deaths - including mine and my loved ones, as it can happen, if it comes to it - in exchange for the destruction of Russia is a bargain.
Russia poses an existential threat to our society and to the world at large. Who do you think is pushing the climate change denial agenda?
Much more damage and much more death and suffering will happen if Russia keeps existing.
Ah, the usual bullshit argument of “go fight it”. Do you think WW3 would have trenches and bayonet charges? This is 2024 and we are the west, we have delegated war to technological superiority backed by doomsday devices. Sure we’d have a few casualties, that’s unavoidable - but hey, omelette and eggs.
To answer your question directly, as silly as it is: my country doesn’t have a draft, we have a professional army which would be more than enough with the rest of NATO to annihilate Russia. But if it came to it, if my death in a bayonet charge contributed to the destruction of Russia, sign me the fuck up.
Needs of the many, etc.
I know right? Big fan of Arnaud Almaric’s approach here.
Don’t worry though, it’s very unlikely for there to be good guys in Mordor :)
Wait is this somebody who is actually based in trump’s clique?
Downvote me all you want but if there is a chance that we’re going to see Moscow glassed i’m almost happy that the orange motherfucker won.
Big “if” though, better start working on that nuclear suitcase come January, you bloated bag of garbage.
2·5 days agoThe price and quality go hand in hand.
Things have a cost and if you’re not paying it in full, somebody else has to. Maybe it’s the Chinese government. Maybe it’s the slave who built it. Maybe it’s future you, struggling to engage windshield wipers on an unresponsive piece of garbage while on the highway.
The price of EVs is due in large part to the battery, so there is only so much you can cut. Some companies sell you a battery with a bare bone car around it (see Dacia spring), others try to justify the price by selling you a premium car (see ioniq or tesla), and others cut down on the battery by selling you a city car with a very limited range (see Renault Zoe or that funny mini car from Citroen).
As things stand now there is just no way to make an EV with both comparable price and performance to an ICE. What needs to happen is technological development on batteries, which would have been much better by now had we bothered to give a fuck years ago.
Ah well if we are considering suicidal strategies then there are simpler and more efficient solutions to achieve the electrification goal!
For example we could just shoot anybody who drives ICE, we’d have 100% market share in a week.
Wouldn’t an all-out war with Iran be the first decent thing Israel does in some time? A racist dictatorial theocracy against another, sign me up (to watch from the other side of the sea).
Also, how would an all-out war even look like? They don’t share a land or sea border, are they going to just Molotov-Ribbentrop Iraq so they can backstab each other in due time like the other dictators did?
Is hurling missiles at each other the best they can do, or am I missing something?
21·10 days agoFrom your mouth to god’s ears
1·10 days agoMa che dice questo articolo?
La Cina in teoria ha i gen5 da un bel pezzetto (il J-31 è stato svelato nel 2012), e non mi risulta che né il J-31 né il J-35 siano ancora andati oltre al livello “demo”, quindi non si capisce cosa giustifichi il discorso che la Cina entra adesso nel club dei gen5 — o ci entra quando li produce per davvero, o ci è entrata 12 anni fa.
Peraltro per come la mette l’articolo i gen5 fino ad ora sono stati appannaggio esclusivo degli USA, quando c’è anche la Russia col Su-57.
Certo, il su-57 è un fighter del Lidl, ma fino ad ora non c’è motivo per considerare diversamente il J-35…
Bottom text indeed, my friend
12·13 days agoBold of you to assume who “you” was.
I’m not commenting you, sir
How does one apply to live in such futures? Because this timeline looks like a bunch of rich douches will join the committee, use it to get richer and live happily ever after.