Progression of the treats on their way to our enlightened nation from our slave nations where they were produced.
You wouldn’t want to stop the treat flow just to save some third-worlder lifes right?
Progression of the treats on their way to our enlightened nation from our slave nations where they were produced.
You wouldn’t want to stop the treat flow just to save some third-worlder lifes right?
Ben Shapiro doesn’t understand much in general to be fair.
Socialism For All ☭ Intensify Class Struggle
“We’ll let you go this time, but remember this is an exception.”
I know, that’s just the title of the video.
“The bad evil regulations are why we still don’t have the bazinga Mhurs rockets”
I think one of the main effect a state should have in this model is offset the negotiations in favor of the ruling class, since the point of the state is to allow the ruling class to guaranty their control over the means of productions.
For example, if workers try to occupy their employer’s factory as a bargaining chip, the owner would call the bourgeoie police to chase them, taking the bargaining chip away from the workers and back to the capitalist who hereby maintain his control over the worker’s jobs and consumption.
So the rulling class should be assumed to have an advantage in negotiations.
If you can find a way to quantify both classes’ negotiation advantage/disadvantage through their amount of control over the means of production, and maybe find a way to have it change over time as class struggle changes the amount of control they have, maybe you could even model the effect of protests and revolutions.
I know right? The purest brainrot I tell you.
This is very interesting.
I think you should try to see what happen if you take into account the influence of the state, not just the bourgeois state but try to see what happen when either classes have state power.
You should also try to account for the tendency for the rate of profit to fall as automation squeeze labor out of production.
This is the most thing I’ve ever seen.
Well I wonder who’s fault that is.
When I said to some random lib “y’all would support a fucking waffen SS if he was against Trump” a while back, I meant it as an hyperbole. I didn’t expect to be this literally correct.
“WE WILL 🅱️ERAFORM 🅱️ARS SO THAT WE CAN LET THE LOOSERS ON EARTH TO DIE AND WE WILL DO TONS OF EPIC SPACE STUFF LIKE SPACE CAPITALISM WITH SLAVES AND BEGGARS LIKE IN STAR WARS AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLES WILL DIE IN EPIC LASER SPACE WAR LIKE IN STAR WARS AND IT WILL ALL BE SO LE EPIC LIKE IN STAR WARS!!!”
I would read that
You could simply have passing an exam/test as a requirement to be a candidate in the election, in fact I’d say most influential positions would need that. For example, it should be required for the general secretary of a communist party to have good knowledge of theory, to ensure that we could have the candidates pass an exam.
“More democracy is bad for democracy”
Don’t touch them, they’ll give you ligma.