Idk that’s why I’m asking

I have a pretty slow machine and GNOME Web is unusable on it. The performance is not comparable to Firefox or Chromium. Extensions are very important for regular people apparently (judging from old Firefox Play Store reviews). Also Firefox and its derivatives are known for advanced privacy features that GNOME Web doesn’t have and likely will never have because GNOME is about extreme simplicity by all costs.

I like GNOME Web and I really can see myself installing it on an old person’s computer because of awesomely simple UI. But it’s not for most people and I’m afraid that without commercial support there won’t be any good regular browsers based on WebKit. I wish engine-specific features didn’t exist. Everything would be so simple without them.

I know about that. I used to use Epiphany myself. The problem is that it’s unpopular, still not nearly as good as the other options and there’s no cross-platform support. The last one is a big problem because 90% of the market uses Android or Windows.

Fedora has one of the more confusing installers, it requires you to know some technical things such as repos and Flathub to set it up, and package names are different to the standard. It’s just not targeted to beginners so why recommend it to beginners? There are better options out there to show them the full power of Linux user friendliness.

They did it to mine data about Fediverse users right?

Huh did I reply to a wrong comment then? I’m pretty sure there was “opinion” in it.

Uhm you’ve never ever heard of drug users, casino players and many many other interesting things right?

I agree because someone told me that the law was edited but the person who replied clearly said “opinion”, not “information”. I do believe that was a sign of toxicity and not just laziness or English issue. As a proof, my own psychological researches confirm that people from similar communities tend to exhibit increased irritability, toxicity and desire of creating exclusive communities.

Nobody can ever know even remotely everything. It’s physically impossible. I’m not a lawyer so it’s not even my main sphere of interest.

Yes ik. My sources were from 2019 or so but I guess they had some outdating issues at that time already.

Then they should’ve used a different word. “Incorrect opinion” is what only a toxic person would say.

It is not a US text but it is accepted to work in the US afaik and I’m quite sure of it. Another person told me that the declaration was edited in 2018 to include the right of abortion. I didn’t know about that and I, in contrary to most people in this discussion, am not afraid to admit this and therefore the fact that I was wrong.

Did I ever claim to?

This information is pretty new. I didn’t know there was the edit.

Calling someone’s opinion “incorrect” shows the true nature of you and the people you represent.

I’m not French and idk French laws. I was talking about the US.

Abortion should be illegal because it violates the UDHR. The UDHR was edited in 2018 to include the right of abortion. Other than that true.

EDIT: sorry for turning this into an off topic political discussion. Didn’t mean to do it here. Delete this comment if you want.

Still adding proprietary and actually evil AI providers is a questionable decision.

They wanted to use fast small language models, not LLMs like Llama

I wasn’t talking about separate states but yea California made some nice tech decisions recently.