It’s keeping the chlorine gas in, obviously.
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
Johem@lemmy.worldto Memes@lemmy.ml•Curb Your Enthusiasm and Crusader Kings III. Sounds good tbh, I'd watch that3·2 years agoWasteland 3 and Stargate SG1.
SG1 versus the payasos would be a fun episode.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.ml•Google is already pushing Web Environment Integrity into Chromium2·2 years agoNot necessarily. With some forms od tracking being curbed, just being sent the who accesses which webpage on what device when (the bare minimum for attestation) has lots of value. And google won’t stop at the bare minimum of data grabbing, of course.
Johem@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Like a hot tub: Water temperatures off Florida soar over 100 degrees30·2 years agoYou know what would really help? Not showing a nice happy vacation beach image with that headline. How about some dead fish, people sweating while doing manual laboue or bleached corals? For fucks sake.
(I know NBC doesn’t read Lemmy, just frustrated)
Johem@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.ml•Musk failed to get the necessary permits to change Twitter’s building signage to X, and the police shut it down just in time for “er” to remain.50·2 years agoThis has to be false. If only ‘er’ remained, the ‘Twitt’ would have been removed. But the twit is still in charge.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Twitter is now X as the little blue bird disappearsEnglish7·2 years agoX.de (German TLD) is even for sale right now and they still didn’t grab it.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.ml•Twitter’s new X logo wasn’t made by an in-house designer. It’s from an old podcast87·2 years agoNot guaranteed, but it might help you turn a 44 billion dollar company into a billion dollar company.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Twitter is now X as the little blue bird disappearsEnglish7·2 years agoThey haven’t even secured x on some big TLDs, their design process is not the only issue.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml•Opinion: You Are Not the Problem — Climate Guilt is a Marketing StrategyEnglish1·2 years agoIn q wq all this is distracting, because there are many, many people who cling to thinking that just doing this or that is already enough. That’s why I call this focus on individual lifestyle choices dangerous. It gives you a psychological out. “I’ve done something, so the problem is out if my hands now,” is a form of complacency I see quite often.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml•Opinion: You Are Not the Problem — Climate Guilt is a Marketing StrategyEnglish1·2 years agoSaying there are countless issues is another one of those convenient distractions. Of course its complex and there are many factors, but we have one basic issue: greenhouse gases.
We will not get to carbon neutral(or a global net negative) by slowly getting used to things by word of mouth. Not by signalling through market forces that we are willing to pay for pea protein instead of meat. It has to be political, it has to decisive and radical action at this point. A carbon tax that makes meat much more expensive instead of being subsidized. Completely changing the funding of transportation from being car focused to public transportation focused. And, perhaps most important of all, government oversight and enforcement with teeth that does not shy away from nuking a company with fines if it steps out of line too often.
All these what YOU can do talk carries the danger of obscuring what needs to be done at a societal and global level.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml•Opinion: You Are Not the Problem — Climate Guilt is a Marketing StrategyEnglish1·2 years agoSaying there are countless issues is another one of those convenient distractions. Of course its complex and there are many factors, but we have one basic issue: greenhouse gases.
We will not get to carbon neutral(or a global net negative) by slowly getting used to things by word of mouth. Not by signalling through market forces that we are willing to pay for pea protein instead of meat. It has to be political, it has to decisive and radical action at this point. A carbon tax that makes meat much more expensive instead of being subsidized. Completely changing the funding of transportation from being car focused to public transportation focused. And, perhaps most important of all, government oversight and enforcement with teeth that does not shy away from nuking a company with fines if it steps out of line too often.
All these what YOU can do talk carries the danger of obscuring what needs to be done at a societal and global level.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml•Opinion: You Are Not the Problem — Climate Guilt is a Marketing StrategyEnglish2·2 years agoThe issue is that going electric already is a convenient lie we tell ourselves. We can’t just replace all cars with electric ones and rhinkbthat we’ve solved it. We need to realize that the level of individual mobility by personal vehicle we have today is not sustainable.
Going electrical helps your individual emissions, sure, but we should be mindful that these are the pseudo solutions sold by people who would rather change nothing.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml•Opinion: You Are Not the Problem — Climate Guilt is a Marketing StrategyEnglish2·2 years agoIt isn’t about getting used to anything or doing your part. Meat and plastic straws are the tip of the iceberg. By focusing on these factors we are constantly failing to address the issue substantially. They are convenient ways to make the problem seem like something that can by solved by a series of small adjustments. As everyone should know by now, that is wrong.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Green - An environmentalist community @lemmy.ml•Opinion: You Are Not the Problem — Climate Guilt is a Marketing StrategyEnglish3·2 years agoThat’s nice and all, but we can’t be the solution by spending decisions and word of mouth of positive experiences with sustainable consumption. You semi-acknowledge that, but that’s dangerous. The time for positive gradual change was 20 years ago, it’s time to get nonviolently angry and demand change.
We need everyone to realize that it’s far from enough to stop using plastic straws or eating less meat. We need fundamental societal and economic change that requires far more than simply adjusting consumption patterns.
Why even involve users? Bots posting AI generated stuff. Upvote bots upvote, comment bots comment and repost bots repost. Its the ciiiiiircle of life…
Johem@lemmy.worldto DACH - jetzt auf feddit.org@feddit.de•Jörg Kachelmann über bevorstehendes Gewitter: "Begeben Sie sich an Orte, an denen nichts auf Sie fallen kann"Deutsch11·2 years ago“…der Temperatursturz im Zuge der Kaltfront wird mit 10 bis 15, örtlich 20 Grad beeindruckend sein.”
Hagel ist doof und ich hoffe es passiert möglichst wenig. Aber… Endlich kühler!
Johem@lemmy.worldto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What are some of the best purchases of your life?English1·2 years agoK240 studio headphones and a Samson Meteor mic. Doesn’t have to be these specifically, but switching from headsets to decent studio headphones and a decent mic is a gamechanger. Sound quality is way better and good build quality makes them last longer. The only thing breaking in years has been a cable (kind of my fault as well) and they can be easily replaced, unlike most headsets.
It’s Terry, so it’s good. But as someone who buys expensive leather shoes due to fucked up feet and good shoes increasing the time until the hurt, it absolutely tracks. I’ve been using my 250€ leather shoes for three years now and they’re still OK. 75€ standard sneakers I used before had holes in the soles within a year.
Johem@lemmy.worldto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•OpenAI being Sued for "Stealing" Peoples Content OnlineEnglish1·2 years agoReddit is currently trying to monetize their user comments and other content by charging for API access. Which creates a system where only the corporations profit and the users generating the content are not only unpaid, but expected to pay directly or are monetized by ads. And if the users want to use the technogy trained by their content they also have to pay for it.
Sure seems like a great deal for corporations and users getting fleeced as much as possible.
It means the person you are replying to is a troll or a moron. Or both.