Clean hands, Cool head, Warm heart.

GP, Gardener, Radical progressive

  • 27 Posts
  • 120 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 7th, 2024

help-circle



  • Hate for Wikipedia comes from a few places.

    The first and most important is that most people who have tried to edit Wikipedia have their first edit reverted, usually with good reason, because they don’t understand the procedures and policies. Unfortunately these procedures and policies are what maintains high quality.

    Related is news articles and blogs about edit wars and less frequently that an article or group of articles is genuinely captured by one volunteer who will protect their own little fiefdoms and not allow anyone else to edit them. This happens but it’s pretty uncommon and the structure of Wikipedia means that it only really stands on fairly obscure articles.

    It’s also true that Wikipedia does have an inherent western liberal bias. It’s subtle but it is there and results from the fact that for the majority of Wikipedia editors western liberalism is the water they swim in. Any claim that is counter to this ideology needs to be cited up the wazoo whereas claims that are confidant with it will often slide without citation. Those with a strong attachment to an alternative ideology often find it infuriating.

    Finally there are individuals who would rather have the arbiter of truth be the powerful rather than a relatively democratic institution.

    All that said Wikipedia is a remarkable achievement and an invaluable part of the internet.


  • It is fine, unless you want a brand that doesn’t have a deal with Bunnings, or unless you want garden furniture that is remotely durable, or unless you want some advice from someone who has experience in hardware.

    Back when Bunnings was one of several large chains and small local hardwares were much more common it was easy, even Bunnings was made better by the competition. Monopolies are bad for consumers.




  • I think this is a bit of a misrepresentation of political correctness. I think the term political correctness is a bit outdated but I’ll use it here.

    Reclaiming derogatory language by minorities is obviously very empowering and has been done successfully. It’s also the case that words that are offensive in one context can be neutrally used, demented and retarded are often used in medical contexts without anyone becoming offended.

    Now one can come up with hypothetical situations where it can be difficult to negotiate whilst being politically correct, especially if the person speaking may not have the vocabulary. But in almost every real life instance of someone complaining about political correctness all that is being asked of them is to be considerate, kind, and inclusive. It can be taken too far but that is the exception, overwhelmingly people are understanding of slip ups or of people not knowing the correct terminology.

    Empathy and kindness are important for their own sake, whether it’s labelled as political correctness or not.





  • I understand why you are putting them together but I think only the CPI measures inflation, there are other indexes also but inflation has to do with the value of money decreasing over time.

    The supply of money is inextricably linked to inflation but an increasing money supply is not inflation, under certain circumstances you could have no, or negative inflation, with increasing money supply. If you had high demand for currency due to large volumes of exports for example.

    In short the terms you want are inflation and money supply.

    Disclaimer: I dropped out of an undergraduate economics degree about 2/3 through around 15 years ago. I believe this is correct but please anyone correct me if not.



  • Since the mods here are already effectively modding that community perhaps they would be interested.

    It definitely needs to be separated, this should be a light hearted community.

    Saying that mildlyinfuriating will allow actually infuriating content until another community is made is a bit like saying we will have foodporn allowing hardcore bondage content until hardcore bondage content until a community is made for hardcore bondage. That isn’t what that community is for.

    Even if there isn’t a specific infuriating community there is almost always another appropriate place, most often one of the politics communities.

    @LillianVS@lemmy.world

    @STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world

    @Tenthrow@lemmy.world




  • So, any doctor that just looks at LDL and says “number high, you take statin” needs to be roundly shamed and sent off to the reeducation camps. This has not been the consensus for decades and modern risk stratification tools generally don’t even take into account LDL and instead use a HDL/Total chol ratio.

    What is uncontroversial is that statins reduce risk in people who are already at moderate to high risk of cardiovascular events, ideally initially with risk stratification tools like ascvd and followed up with coronary artery calcium scoring or angiography if required.

    For FH in particular statins do dramatically reduce risk of CV events.

    The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events and of death from cardiovascular causes at 39 years of age was lower among the patients with familial hypercholesterolemia than among their affected parents (1% vs. 26% and 0% vs. 7%, respectively).

    20-Year Follow-up of Statins in Children with Familial Hypercholesterolemia NB. The children took statins, their parents didn’t.

    Your doctor may know all this or they may be a quack who is right by accident. I’d guess the former, I’ve been a doctor for a decade and was taught the above in medical school.

    @jet@hackertalks.com





  • I’m just about done with Shaman by Kim Stanley Robinson, I’ve read most of his work and this might be his strongest work. It’s clear from the Mars and science in the capitol trilogies that the man is obsessed with stone age culture so it’s an obvious choice of setting for him and unlike much of the rest of his work it’s a simple and self contained story.

    I’m also a few chapters into Julia by Sandra Newman, a retelling of 1984 from Julia’s pov. Very evocative and well written so far, looking forward to the rest of the book.