Leegh [he/him]

“Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will”

  • 5 Posts
  • 259 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 23rd, 2022

help-circle
  • China cannot do any international power projection until they deal with the Taiwan issue first. As long as reunification is not complete, America can keep using that island as a wedge against China, both in geopolitical manoeuvring and economic trade/ warfare.

    And even in the case of Taiwan where China actually DOES do power projection, they would rather resort to peaceful means of getting what they want (soft power through economic integration, diplomatic warming, cultural exchanges, and buying out Taiwanese politicians, military officers, and businesspeople) than the American brute force method of using military invasion, gunboat diplomacy, and sanctions.

    Of course, this could change as the so-called Davidson window closes next year and China finally reaches military parity with the USA, but they still have to deal with the empire being on their doorstep before doing anything more to help countries like Cuba.



  • I won’t deny he made significant contributions to the field of linguistics, although his rationalist position on the Human language is debatable, but in regard to geopolitics and socioeconomics? My guy, Michael Parenti’s works and lectures are right there. Hell, there are a plethora of Western Marxist thinkers in the last century that have far better input on how Base and Superstructure operates than Chomsky ever did. Even fucking Einstein had better takes on Socialism than he did.

    Just because Chomsky is more popular and his works are cited more by liberals, doesn’t mean he should be lauded by anyone on the left as an arbiter of ‘socialist’ thought. Especially when his views on AES have always been downright reactionary and orientalist (no, not “in his late years” but for decades), calling states like the DPRK “the most horrible regime in Human history” and China “a very brutal society, a brutal government. I don’t feel any particular interest in improving relations with it.”.

    As someone who descended from a family who came from that “very brutal society” I do not have any qualms denouncing someone like Chomsky who peddles bigoted views against non-western societies.

    Also, I think simply calling him a “pedophile sympathizer” is minimizing his complicity don’t you think? You’re acting as if he just questioned age of consent laws or expressed sympathy to Epstein when what he really did was actively collaborate with and defend a Billionaire paedophile that he was VERY close with. He even received tens of thousands of dollars from Epstein to fund his linguistic academic pursuits lmao. Even if you ignore the whole pedo ring, he was still an active class collaborator with the American bourgeoisie (which honestly, explains his anti-communist views a lot). He may be an intellectual, but an ally of the socialist left he is not.


  • Perhaps most strikingly, in late February 2019, Epstein represented to an associate that he had gotten advice from Chomsky over how to navigate “the horrible way you are being treated in the press and public”.

    “The best way to proceed is to ignore it,” Chomsky wrote, according to text signed under his first name that Epstein sent to a lawyer and publicist. “That’s particularly true now with the hysteria that has developed about abuse of women, which has reached the point that even questioning a charge is a crime worse than murder.”

    How did anyone ever consider this guy an intellectual giant of the Western left is beyond me.






  • It’s not a matter of copy pasting policy, it’s a matter of making sure you’re actually governing in the interests of the working class. And I do not see how Rodriguez’ sudden turn towards further privatization of the oil industry (which again, is their biggest economic output and the main source of their economic sovereignty) by American corporations is anything but an appeasement of the US empire and a betrayal of the will of the people. Having a different history does not mean you excuse a shift towards further Neoliberalism. China is rightfully criticized by many on Hexbear for their continuation of pro-market/ right deviationist policies, there is zero reason to exclude Venezuela from this.

    The fact that Venezuela is not even a Marxist-Leninist state (and therefore do not approach Socialism from a scientific lens like Cuba and China do) means that we should be extra critical of the Venezuelan state, in much the same way we should be critical of Iran or Russia despite all three being anti-imperialist. Of course, it would be nice if I was proven wrong on this and Rodriguez was playing 6D chess against Trump, but that is not how dialectical materialists think.












  • On a more positive note, the article shares this incredibly based quote from a former Bethesda PR-head:

    During an interview with Vice News which centered on this outrage, Bethesda’s then-director of PR, Pete Hines, told the outlet, “Unless you’re a Nazi, there should be nobody who’s opposed to the idea of being against Nazis.” When told that the game’s aggressive marketing tone might be poking the hornet’s nest, Hines even doubled down, saying, “Maybe a little bit, but the hornet’s nest is full of Nazis so…fuck those guys. I’ll poke a Nazi hornet’s nest.”

    I hope the company still has people like this working in it.