RavingGrob

No, I don’t think I will.

It bothers me more than it should, that the graph does not accurately portray the magnitude of 28TB vs 540GB

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compose_key

If I had a nickel for each time this week, I needed to link to this, I’d have two nickels; which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compose_key

I set my caps lock key to the Compose Key (ck), and it changed the game for me:

• — is ck then “—”
• é is ck then “e” followed by ’
• ° is ck then double “o”
• ½ is ck then “1” followed by “2”

I’m sure there’s many more combinations, but honestly, I never intentionally used CAPS LOCK for anything.

I don’t believe onions are tubers…

I am not disingenuous in asking them.

I’m not even necessarily talking about the current situation here.

I’m asking you, where your line in the sand is.

If someone was in your home, threatening your life, or your loved one’s lives, and they absolutely were not empty threats, would violence to the point of killing be “justified”?

For example, should the Ukrainians not defend their sovereignty, on their own soil, because killing at all is immoral?

You came at this with a black and white statement, but there are nuances to the world that shape the decisions outside of a binary “they killed/didn’t kill”

Troll? You haven’t answered either of my questions? Lmao. Not everything is black and white my guy.

Again, I am legitimately curious what your opinions about this are.

You can sling insults all you want. It doesn’t further your argument in any legitimate way.

So in your mindset, there’s zero point where killing is “justifiable”?

I’m legitimately asking here.

In a perfect world, people would respect boundaries, not start war, or genocides to further their own beliefs.

What do you propose people facing extinction do? Parlay?