

Buddha, just seconds before enlightenment:
-you know what actually fuck those guys heavenly light
Buddha, just seconds before enlightenment:
-you know what actually fuck those guys heavenly light
(in the objective sense that his comments score very highly on the toxic-bert scoring system)
Thatās an ML model. Like I searched and toxic-bert
is just a github repo.
āobjectiveā go fuck a cow
Feels like overlooking the same issue as with every other AI use
When a human makes a mistake and is called out, they can usually fix the mistake. When genAI outputs nonsense, itās fucking nonsense, you canāt fix something thatās fundamentally made up, and if you try to āask itā to fix it itāll just respond with more nonsense. I hallucinated this case? Certainly! Hereās 3 other cases you could cite instead: 3 new made up cases
I expect the last step in that is you slapping him?
Itās extremely annoying everywhere. GitHubās updates were about AI for so fucking long that I stopped reading them, which means I now miss actually useful stuff until someone informs me of it months later.
For example, did you know GitHub Actions now has really good free ARM runners? Itās amazing! I love it! Shame GitHub only botherās to tell me about their revolutionary features of āplease spam me with useless PRsā and⦠make a pong game? What? Why would I want this?
I wanna be software The best design Infinite princess Computer mind
Substituting this for the text whenever I see Sammy Boy say something again
hot AI girls are on track to remove a lot of men from the mating pool.
Wasnāt the āproblemā that thereās too many men in the mating pool and women are āalphamaxxingā or whatever the fuck to get the highest quality dick? Shouldnāt this be a good thing for incels like Hanania.
Missed opportunity to call it āLive Free or Fail Hardā
This is such a wild example to me because sitting at beach is extremely boring and takes forever whereas doing calculus is at least engaging so time flies reasonably quick.
Like when I think what takes the longest in my life I donāt think āthose times when Iām actively solving problemsā, I think āthose times I sit in a waiting room at the doctors with nothing to doā or ācommuting, dittoā.
Thatās wrong on both counts.
The complaints about NFTs were also that they were unethical - consumed a shitton of electricity for no reason, sustained themselves mostly by scams and rugpulls. The chief use case of crypto has always been crime and money laundering.
The complaints about AI are that it fucking sucks and results in a truly insane waste of resources towards something that doesnāt solve literally any problems, like NFTs squared. The unethical aspect of it all is just a cherry on top that makes using LLMs a no-go even if it happened to kinda work for your problem.
Iām not surprised by the results, but itās hardly a fair assessment of the usefulness of AI.
Itās a more than fair assessment of the claims of usefulness of AI which are more or less āfire all your devs this machine is better than them alreadyā
Itās going to be your INT bonus modifier, but you can get a feat that also adds the WIS modifier
For prolonged coding sessions you do need CON saving throws, but you can get advantage from drinking coffee (once per short rest)
Whatās the standard advice to give them?
Itās unfortunately illegal for me to answer this question earnestly
Is this generated by a Markov chain? Itās incoherent, but in a kinda amusing way?
Is this you, disc horse bot?
Itās a stupid thing that
Itās one of those places where yes, the spelling rules say otherwise, but the rule is fucking stupid so anarchy it is.
Iām more irked by ālessā, the noun there is dollars so it should be āfewerāā¦
Anyway, they say it covers Node and to any question regarding Node the answer is ānoā, I donāt need an AI to know webdev fundamentals
It seems that the test itself is generated by autoplag? At least thatās how I understand the PS and one of the comments about āvibe regressionā in response to an error
Chat-GPT is more powerful than anyone on earth (if you squint)
xD
No sorry, let me rephrase,
Lol, lmao
How do you even grace this with a response. Shut your eyes and loudly sing ālalalala I canāt hear youā
Just the usual stuff religions have to do to maintain the faƧade, āthis is all true but gee oh golly do NOT live your life as if it was because the obvious logical conclusions it leads to end in terrorismā
What? What are you talking about? Citation? Efficient wrt. what? Microbenchmarks? Itās certainly not actual computational complexity. Do you think going forward in an array is different computationally from going backward?