ZapataCadabra [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • See but Kissinger felt like a worthy adversary. A cold, calculating man who you could despise but also know he was smart and crucial in shepherding the empire.

    Bolton is a raving lunatic who just wants to bomb Iran and will settle for any point on the map remotely close to it. He didn’t earn shit, he made his name during Bush 2 when America had no powerful adversaries. He didn’t mastermind shit, he just got to ride with the new cabal in power.

    Dick Cheney is my generation’s Kissinger. Dick Cheney is who we direct all our hexes and curses towards. And unlike Kissinger, Cheney made sure to get paid handsomely for his tenure as evil advisor to the emperor.


















  • I’m gonna try to follow your logic in good faith. If both Russia and the US should be held accountable for their crimes, then who should actually hold them accountable?

    NATO is the international arm of the US military and it has committed war crimes over its entire decades of existence, some of the most recent ones in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. If the US is to be held equally accountable for their actions as the RF should be, then all NATO operations should be held under the same scrutiny.

    So by this logic how can you support a NATO in it’s actions in Ukraine. Before Russia invaded, NATO was supported the bombing of the Donbass and the destruction of that region. If the US and NATO has a history of destabilizing regions through warfare for the benefit of the US, how can any of their actions be justified?