I knew a girl, whose mother sold off her house because a mystic/fortune teller/crystal fellator/astrologist told her to.

Now, whether she just inferred this on her own, or the scam artist explicitly suggested it, the outcome was the same.

Making real life decisions based off a set of tarot cards is not wise.

For the uninitiated: you’re looking at a court divorce in progress, where these two fascinating individuals are splitting the perceived value of their combined Beanie Babies collection.

There’s a much easier way.

https://docs.linuxserver.io/images/docker-jellyfin/#usage

Copy the text from the docker-compose section, and paste it into a file called compose.yaml

You can also add your other programs which rely on each other (Sonarr/Radar/qBitttorrent) in this same compose.yaml file (you can find them on this website).

When copying the other programs, omit the lines:

---
Services:

After that, in your terminal, navigate to where the compose.yaml file is, and run this command

docker compose up -d

Now your suite of applications are installed and can talk to each other.

You’ll need to change some of the details of the compose file (to set timezones and media directories).

You can restart programs with

docker restart jellfin

LinuxServer.io are basically your one-stop shop for home-server applications

You guys are gross. He’s obviously working through his brain hemorrhage.

Are you using the LSIO docker image, or did you install it manually via the official website instructions?

That’s why I always:

• cd .cache
• ls
• rm -r *

I mean…

1000 inhabitants with only one male.

Anyone else get the urge to pull the hat down?

You spell stoopid with three O"s. Maybe your the stoopid,

Help a wannabe writer of you can.

Sure; your title has a typo.

You’re literally too stupid to argue with, I’m not wasting my time even reading this shit.

Sure, and I’m not claiming otherwise.

We’re arguing about semantics, of course I’m going to argue about the textbook definition.

I’m not denying tradition has often had a deeper meaning behind it which has resulted in good outcomes.

All I’ve been saying this entire time is that as far as REASONS go, tradition IS the least valid.

If you choose to conflate “good reason” with “good outcome”, go argue with a dictionary.

I think the problem here is you’ve assumed my usage of “good” and “bad” are referring to the net reduction / increase of suffering.

I’ve been using the term “worst” as synonymous with “least valid”. So yes, within my context, good reason implicitly follows the form A->B.

Seriously, think about it for a moment. without knowing whether the OUTCOME is good or bad, what is a good REASON?

If you found your friend bleeding out, slipping in and out of consciousness, life and death situation, and a cop chases you all the way to the hospital, do you think the cop is going to think you have a good REASON for speeding?

Tradition is the least valid reason (in terms of epistemology) for doing anything.

Saying “because” is just straight up invalid.

alternatively:

There are better reasons for all those things.

“Because the decorating the Christmas tree is fun and it looks pretty”

“Because it’s nice for me to give and receive gifts”

“Because Turkey tastes good”

As another commenter replied to you, you’re conflating bad outcomes with good reasons.

“To watch the world burn” is still a better reason, even if the outcome is the same, or worse.

if you really want to play this game:

• that’s how it is.
• why is that how it is?
• because that’s how it is.
• why is it because that’s how it is?

You’re in the same boat.

Epistemologically, “that’s how it is” is too declarative for that which we don’t know.

Being asked an endless series of questions for me is going to end with “I don’t know”.

I’m not convinced this is a valid reason. It’s really just another way of saying “because I want to”, which is still a better than tradition.