![](https://thelemmy.club/pictrs/image/6658f375-c275-4b18-a5d3-cbb2998f11ed.webp)
![](https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/ccbc1d32-aa21-4d26-bb28-42e63bd83083.png)
Tawny Newsome is awesome, so I’m sure this will be good, but there seems to be a fundamental tension between Kurtzman saying Trek can broaden, while Paramount seems to be trying to contract it.
Programmer with a linguistics background, dad, trekkie (he/him/his)
Tawny Newsome is awesome, so I’m sure this will be good, but there seems to be a fundamental tension between Kurtzman saying Trek can broaden, while Paramount seems to be trying to contract it.
This is fair. Usually when I hear “prescriptive” I have a knee-jerk reaction to it as something bad because it’s usually used to refer to people using made-up rules to enforce systems of oppression rather than fight against them like inclusive language does, but I hadn’t thought about it as “prescriptivism for good.”
Ironic that the actor who seems to be the biggest Trek fan also played my least favorite character. Zeph was a cartoon.
Using inclusive language isn’t linguistic prescriptivism. Prescriptivism is saying “this word is incorrect English/doesn’t mean what you are using it for.” Inclusive language is saying “if you use this word, you’re being a jerk.”
I don’t know how, but I would love to see more of these characters in live action. Tawny Newsome and Jack Quaid were fantastic in BNW.