I would pay to see cart narc take on JD
I would pay to see cart narc take on JD
or at least ban things like styrofoam
There goes breakfast
I think you’ll find that there’s still quite a crowd that would. UBI for sure would help curb the those on the street scene just trying to pay to survive. But there’s a huge group of only fans models that do things not to survive, but rather to become ultra wealthy
Execs are furiously taking notes right now
The real issue is putting tomatoes in the fridge.
Serious question, couldn’t you bypass this by just setting up different LLCs that only have one or two properties under them?
not only that but we get a fresh look at why we were wrong and shouldn’t have asked the question in the first place
This reminds me of an old Michael Jackson joke from the 90s. What does MJ like about 21 year olds? There’s twenty of them. Slaps knee :explosion: … God
My thoughts (and gradles) on how to make a strong guess involves the reduction of possibilities. Your guess of Baron reduced the possible amount of words it could be, down to 1. After that, you could really only have 1 word match the letters. Part of making strong guesses in my opinion are being able to either use commonly used letters and then start organizing location. I’m sure everyone has a different strategy though
Baron was a strong guess, nice job
deleted
Upon reading this comment, thousands of conservatives exploded into a fit of rage induced by a misplaced fear of oppression
It would technically be wrong because the dates would have no appropriate scale. The difference between each node could be wildly different and also irrelevant to the solution space this virtual representation is trying to convey. Egg before chicken, check
I don’t think that’s exactly the same situation though. Your comment reads as utilitarian, is that your reasoning for it? The object personification lends to an association of empathy for the object itself. Meaning that maybe the object is a human too and acts as we do
Finally I can put some take into this. I’ve worked in memory testing for years and I’ll tell you that it’s actually pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time. So much so that what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells. We add more memory cells than we might activate at any given time. When shit goes awry, we can reprogram the memory controller to remap the used memory cells so that the bad cells are mapped out and unused ones are mapped in. We don’t probe memory cells typically unless we’re doing some type of in depth failure analysis. usually we just run a series of algorithms that test each cell and identify which ones aren’t responding correctly, then map those out.
None of this is to diminish the engineering challenges that they faced, just to help give an appreciation for the technical mechanisms we’ve improved over the last few decades
Except that it’s not an open source product.
so basically real life