A sorry. “Discussion” was wrong.

Sounds like a psyop to artificially devide the left.

It is literally a discussion about a different theoretical perspective, disguised as a moral Attack and also stating basically a no-brainer-take.

It’s absolutely Imperative that in the new world Order the UN has to be a stronger (best would be THE strongest) global Military Power.

We have to figure out how something Like this rogue stateship of the Military hegemon of the world can be stopped. Otherwise Things gonna repeat themselves.

Make crime or make no crime.

Is it allowed to be a serious question for the rest of us as well? Or is it just the fucking Military that has the Option to ditch the Law?

Not a redneck but a collegue of mine said to me dead serious that a planned economy is not Communist, because big corporations use it.

What are you gonna do with people that seemingly barely manage to find their mouth to put food in it?!

Maybe people in n the left dont speak about it because it is a kook Thing. While conserves need to Milk that gender cow for their fascist culture war.

The counterspell is called: Arbeitszeitbetrug

Polo

Idc.

Do it.

Could they please cooperate with Framework and create Universal Joints?

Probably but i gave the benefit of the doubt

Wäre wohl das Parlament

In Killing their own Citizens.

Not in Killing Citizens Generally.

Wir schaffen ein System, das denen, die sich ernsthaft bemühen, eine echte Perspektive bietet

Okay…wie?

And that’s why we know Iran has no nukes

Fängt es an? Tut Dummheit langsam weh?

Ah okay the specificity!

Thank you!

Lets Talk about Graves.

Not only they call us Nazis but our laws call us nazis.

Solidarity with palastine is often Times already equated with Support for Hamas, which then in turn is interpreted as Support for antisemitic Terror Organisation and the you are held legally responsible for being antisemitic.

I bet there are already precedents when Israel was criticised and that was legally regarded as antisemitism, i am unaware of.