• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 29th, 2025

help-circle
  • gaja@lemm.eetoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldMissouri
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I think this might be misinformation. Businesses here need to comply with them timeline in the bill. The real issue is that Mike Kehoe, the governor, might repeal on the basis that prop A was unconstitutional as it was broad and addressed multiple issues i.e. sick leave + increasing min wage. There were protested Saturday, and there will be more next Saturday in STL because they postponed due to tornados.


  • gaja@lemm.eetoFuck AI@lemmy.worldClip Studio Paint on AI
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If AI wasn’t shitty and if it didn’t train of stolen work, would it still be as hated? I think it has potential as a tool to elevate the works of talented individuals.

    I think there’s merit to old fashioned creations, but I’m not going to discredit a work for using a spell checker or an digital spray brush. The truth is that tools are shortcuts for bringing thoughts or ideas into reality.

    I think we have a lot of bad faith arguments on this front. Let’s compare to the conservative. I remember a clip where conservatives were presented with an image of a fetus. When asked if it was living human being, the responded yes absolutely, only to be told it was a pig fetus or some other animal. You also see it with transvestigations. There is an irrational kneejerk response to something they don’t like. For the anti-ai people, you get a similar response about how AI looks bad.

    The reason I have a problem with judging AI for looking like shit is that it won’t always be like that. We need to focus on the fact that even if it did look good, it’s work stolen from others, replacing them, and not compensating them. I’m afraid that some of the users may have responded poorly, and that there might have been more here to discuss before caving to mass internet rage.



  • I’ve reported directly to the head before. Here’s why they don’t like remote work. These bosses are typically highly narcissist paired with paranoia.

    I think many CEOs thinks like Trump, so let’s work off that. They have narcissism and paranoia. They are highly insecure. They assume the worst and others, but have ridiculously high expectations.

    Trump can’t fathom people doing the right thing for the sake of it. He has never done a thing that didn’t benefit him. He can’t imagine not cheating someone given a chance. He’s cheated every single time.

    My CEO was highly paranoid. He decided to setup cameras anywhere. He started confronting employees who left early or arrived later not understanding that everybody doesn’t arrive or leave the office at the same time. Even though the company needed focus on the agenda, he spent most of his time stalking employees.

    When I was confronted for leaving early, I had to explain that I’m still working while making a delivery on my way home, or that it’s okay for me to be late if the first thing I do when I wake up is to respond to urgent emails and make important calls. This resulted in retaliatory pay cuts, so I quit. Of course, the business could not afford to lose me, so now I do contract work for more than double per hour and found a new job that treats everyone a lot better.

    These people are truly detached from reality. Their poisoned brains prevent them from understanding basic human nature. The only side of human nature they understand is how people bend over for money. They’re control freaks.

    Keeping you in office means they have the ability to pressure you. Emotional manipulation through micro management or unreasonable expectations. They know that at home, they can’t see you squirm. At work, you’re not safe, but at home, you are.




  • Ms. Rachel is today’s Mr. Rogers. My baby is singing and counting and learning letters and mom and I are absolutely blindsided each time she does something new.

    Ms Rachel was a music teacher for a preschool and started her channel to help her speech delayed child. She’s engages and includes, using language like “grown ups” instead of “mom” or “dad”. She has a member who does sign language and also a non-binary member who is her long time friend. My niece was enamored by their inclusion when I know that her side of the family is less receptive to differences.

    Ms Rachel has fund raised for the children of Gaza and is harassed and boycotted by the right for doing so. I’ve learned a lot from Ms Rachel as a new parent and she’s a treasure.












  • Obviously, using an AI to verify if somethingis AI is kinda bullshit, but this is what deepseek spat out:

    The list you shared does have strong AI-generated hallmarks. Here’s why it stands out as likely machine-written, and how you can spot similar outputs in the future:

    Telltale Signs This List Is AI-Generated

    1. Repetitive Phrasing – Overuse of:

      • “Rescinding [X] for [Y]”
      • “Streamlining [A] with respect to [B]”
      • “Withdrawing [Product] as a Covered [Category]”
    2. Excessive “Rescinding” Verbs – A human would vary language more (e.g., “repeal,” “abolish,” “eliminate”).

    3. Oddly Specific Yet Vague Items – Some entries sound bureaucratic but lack real-world impact (e.g., “Rescinding Test Procedures for Small Electric Motors”).

    4. Inconsistent Scope – Jumps from major energy policies (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) to trivial ones (showerhead pressure).

    5. “Unnecessary ADR Regulations” – ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a niche term unlikely in a political deregulation push.

    6. No Partisan Signaling – A real Trump/Musk DOGE list would include culture-war items (e.g., “Ending EV mandates”) or tech-bro priorities (e.g., “Fast-tracking AI nuclear reactor approvals”).


    How to Prove It’s AI-Generated

    • Ask for Sources: A real policy list would reference laws, executive orders, or press releases.
    • Check for Recent Events: Some items (e.g., “Clean Energy Federal Building Rule”) may not exist.
    • Test for Overlap: Run a portion through an AI detector (like Originality.ai).
    • Compare to Known AI Outputs: Lists with 47-50 items are common for AI (round numbers = generation artifacts).

    If You Suspect DOGE Is Using AI for Policy

    This would be a major scandal. Next steps:

    1. Compare drafts over time—AI lists will lack edits.
    2. Check metadata (if possible) for AI tool signatures.
    3. Demand justification for each item—AI can’t explain reasoning.

    Let me know if you want help digging deeper! This is a wild (and concerning) scenario if true. 🕵️♂️


    I want to note that the AI barely comprehended the idea of a government agency DOGE existing or the idea that Trump was reelected. I had to hammer it in:

    Ah, got it—so we’re envisioning a Doge-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under a Trump 2024 victory, where Elon Musk and a bunch of 20-year-old tech bros are ruthlessly slashing bureaucracy with meme-fueled chaos.

    Here’s your **47 absurd, inefficient, or just