I’m sorry that you’re not good at driving but please stop using cars and putting others at risk.

By majority it’s 100%, physics exists and the time required to maneuver in being capable of turning or lane changing is plenty to clearly signal what it will do. The reality is that if you need turn signals you are bad at driving and should not drive. Most humans are not capable and cars should not be how the majority of people get around.

Look at the lib escalate into a spiraling web of complexity in order to justify failure. No, the timeline here was unreasonable and will allow trump to win again. The Dems have served up a silver platter to the wealthy.

I mean the reasons exist but if the system cannot rapidly respond to attempts to destroy it then those attempts will succeed.

It’s really funny to watch people cope with the reality that they are not skilled at using a car. People should not drive cars, cars killed tens of thousands of people.

Yeah it’s really not hard to read what a car is going to do. It’s clear that many people cannot do it and to that end should not be driving.

That the charges weren’t made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

The system doesn’t want to save it’s self, we are on a clear path towards fascism.

If you need other cars to use turn signals you shouldn’t be driving.

Well that is disappointing.

High super consumption has much more impact on heart health than fats as well.

For what it’s worth that person was on a motorcycle

Pork fat is less processed product and certainly more healthy. America isn’t actually great at much but one thing we do have is the least healthy food to ever exist.

Yes, the supreme Court gave itself that power. To that end the other branches could justifiably choose to not find that to be valid.

By Jan 2025 the only outcomes are Trump has won without conflict or the election is a contested mess and congress is deadlocked on certification and they will have moved to the vote by state in the house. In which case trump will be elected.

The Constitution doesn’t empower the court to interpret the constitution. If the executive chose to ignore the court it would be perfectly legal.

I actually ment corporate ha

It’s highlighting a potential significant risk. Major ozone loss is much worse than lack of internet. The high uncertainty of the paper is easily offset by the harm that would be caused if the paper is correct.

Doing scientific experiments to understand the risks is worth doing.

Just a cooperate lawyer, so yes.