I’m conflicted on this. On one hand, there are clear problems with the electoral college situation right now, but on the other hand, getting rid of it means that the tyranny of the majority will become a bigger problem. It’s unclear to me which is worse or how we can fix the latter.

[ up,up,up -> Enter ]

So if I understand this right, his terminal history consists entirely of commands you’ve run to fix his recurring problems.

Hmmmm… A quick pickled depression you say

Still, some are closer to the source of these ideas than others, think about awards attributed to individuals for example.

This is where the researchers would disagree with you. I don’t know if you’ve ever been involved in research (or startups). There’s a common saying that ideas are a dime a dozen. It’s much more so the work you do that’s important, not the idea itself.

singers, actors, politicians, or youtubers

Notice how being in the spotlight is an important aspect of all the professions you’ve listed. That naturally selects for people who are comfortable with or enjoy being on camera and are good at that kind of live performance. Similarly, science selects for people who are good at doing science. Sometimes, there’s an overlap, but it’s not that common.

If you’re interested in interviews with prominent scientists, Lex Fridman does quite a few of those. But if you want more people to do this, you’ll have to contend with the fact that most scientists simply have no interest in being on camera and probably never developed the skills needed for it.

We likely don’t know much about the researchers of modern technology because they’re often created by a huge team of hundreds of people. There’s no single person responsible for the bulk of the work. In the case of ChatGPT and the line of work leading up to it, it was very much also the researchers’ choice as well to not name a specific person as being the main contributor. For example, the transformer paper had all the author names shuffled so the credit doesn’t all end up with one person.

Same. I keep thinking back to my time TAing for an intro programming course and getting students who just add random braces until their code compiles. That’s me right now with Rust pointers.

I have no idea what I’m even missing out on by not paying for Discord but others are happy to pay for it, so I think that’s a pretty reasonable offering. I can’t speak for the YouTube and Tiktok example though since I don’t use those.

As a developer? You’re not going to get very far if you refuse to write websites for the world’s current most popular browser.

A person who bases their decisions on scientific thinking would determine killing is bad

Science does not produce value judgements.

What kind of help? Do you need friends to play with?

I think the idea is that if you create the demand for hydrogen, then there will be more incentive to produce cheap and environmentally friendly hydrogen.

Have you accounted for the “wages” of the shareholders?

And that’s not all. It’s easy to tell someone the high level area that you’re working on, but to explain the exact problem you’re trying to solve and why it’s interesting? That’s a whole journey into many topics that are very unintuitive for human brains to grasp and sometimes require heavy mathematical abstractions to even see that there’s a problem to begin with.

If you’re reading an academic paper, you just follow the citations until someone defines it.

Yeah, it’s dumb. We write like normal people in academic papers too. I don’t know why they ever taught it this way.

Markov chains, but without being Markovian.

The numbers you want to look at are PDCASS and/or DIAAS scores of each protein source.

I somehow misread “sink” as “shower”. Yeah, I agree with you here.

But it does get rid of the need to reduce splashing

Exclusive or would mean that if the owner happens to sell at exactly 25 years, then there’s no need to repay. It wouldn’t make sense.

Based on the other comments, it sounds like you mean “and” rather than “xor”?