• 33 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • joseph@lemm.eeOPtoGun Memes@lemmy.worldHA, poor!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just bought a taurus G2C.

    is the trigger pull and reset my favorite? No. It’s way too long on both ends. But you’ve gotta compromise somewhere when you’re cheap like me. The important thing is it’s a consistent gun that doesn’t jam (if you can handle the recoil, and I can), with good capacity, and strong enough to kill anyone threatening me.



  • joseph@lemm.eeOPtoGun Memes@lemmy.worldFight me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it’s faster. But the speed up from 1.2 to .8 is not relevant, because it’s still not going to out draw someone who has the drop on you.

    To be clear, I carry with one in the chamber. I advocate that others do the same, unless they have some reason not to. I just don’t like people claiming there is one and only one way to carry a gun.







  • joseph@lemm.eeOPtoGun Memes@lemmy.worldFight me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s nice. I don’t really mind if you carry hot. I do to. I’m just bugged by the people who insist you’re going to die racking the slide when you can get a round off in barely over a second without one in the chamber. It’s not the way you carry, it’s the way you train.



  • joseph@lemm.eeOPtoGun Memes@lemmy.worldFight me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I totally agree. I carry chambered myself. But the meme is more about the people who haven’t even thought about it and just repeat what they’ve been told to believe.

    Frankly, when I first realized how fast your draw to first shot could be even unchambered, I seriously considered switching. And I think everyone should consider it, instead of knee jerk ridiculing unchambered carry.





  • Think of it this way.

    Is it ethical to force someone to be a catholic, or a jew, or an atheist, or a hindu? I think you’ll agree it is unethical. Suppose we didn’t have the first amendment. Would that suddenly change the morality of forcing someone to practice or not practice a religion? I think we’ll both agree it is still not ethical.

    So then, the first amendment didn’t <i>create</i> a right to freedom of religion. It <i>described</i> a right that already existed. It tries to bring legality in line with morality.

    The same is true for the second amendment. Gun ownership isn’t ethical because of the second amendment. The second amendment exists because gun ownership is ethical.