@baris looks to be Persona, could be a bug with the theme.

@freamon v4.0.1 contains this fix.

@jdp23@neuromatch.social can you please update the category handles on discussions.thenexus.today? There was a bug that caused some categories to not respond to webfinger request appropriately, so they could not be found on fedi.

You can just change them from one handle to another, and then back again.

That should fix the issue with the testing category not being able to be found.

@arachnibot@nodebb.arachnibot.com mm actually this also doesn’t happen currently when you manually move a topic to a category.

Your local account boosts it but not the category. That’s a feature I’d like to add to core, please open an issue.

@nhl.pl je ne pas parlez francais 😬

@m_f@discuss.online good question! The threadiverse can be considered that software, plus other threaded-style software like NodeBB and Discourse. The working group includes members from most of those, in an effort to promote our own priorities forward to the fediverse at large 🙂

@fxomt@lemm.ee this summary is gold.

@Kichae I’m not seeing an issue (although I haven’t done exhaustive testing) between my test instance and this site.

Can you let me know one of your federating categories, so I can try to set up a sync?

@arachnibot@nodebb.arachnibot.com for Lemmy? No, not anymore.

A future version of Lemmy will remove audience. You’ll have to dereference the addressing fields (to, cc).

cc @projectmoon@forum.agnos.is

Hi @alter_kaker! You’ll want to press the “Add Group” button at the bottom right of the privilege table.

Keep in mind that privileges are additive.

@projectmoon@forum.agnos.is no link yet, was just speaking hypothetically

https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/issues/13085

@projectmoon@forum.agnos.is @arachnibot I love how I want to add this to the core logic and someone beats me to it with a third party plugin.

It’s absolutely fantastic, and exactly how our plugin system should work!

@arachnibot yes, offhand I think it should (although I didn’t check the code).

When remote content is parsed I just call the same internal methods to create a topic.

@Kosiak Sure thing, v4 shipped with allow/deny lists so you can specify which domains to add to that list.

In your case, you’d be using an allow-list.

The same limitations to the content sharing model still apply. Topics and posts won’t magically flow between the sites unless follow relationships exist or you set up category syncing.

@projectmoon@forum.agnos.is yes, Lemmy has a local representation of this category, and sends the post here. I see that it’s addressed to the category and automatically slot it in

@arachnibot@nodebb.arachnibot.com said in Is ActivityPub too complicated?: > Mainly wanted to sync remote group actors to a category for organizational purposes.

Yeah that’s a great use case, and definitely what it ought to be used for. Let me look into nodebb-to-nodebb folllowing, that definitely should be working!

I opened an issue on Lemmy’s repo

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/5354

The thing is, what is the actual end-result you’re looking for? It sounds like you want stuff from a remote lemmy community to be sent to your NodeBB. If that’s the case, you could just follow the community as a user. Search for technology@lemmy.ml (for example) in the search bar, and once you follow the community, you will start seeing those posts in your /world feed.

The category synchronization options are for if you want to see a Lemmy community’s posts in a category of your own. Might be that’s what you want too.

But at present Lemmy doesn’t support it :)

Completely understood, that’s why it’s always been such a sticking point. We have some migrators available, but it’s not always as easy as running a script and coming back to a NodeBB-compatible DB. There are always some thorny edge cases that crop up over and over again.

Unfortunately we’re not quite there yet, but perhaps we can get part of the way by consuming an ActivityPub actor’s outbox? hmm… food for thought :laughing:

@Astro-What would you believe that there could be a solution for that too?

There’s a project out there called Nitro-Porter which aims to do that, for all sorts of forum software.

So far they can only migrate away from NodeBB, but if the right client came along we’d be happy to match funding with that client to get a migrator made so that people can migrate to. NodeBB.

@cagatay I think so. If A follows B, then B sends stuff to A, but A doesn’t send stuff to B.