kivork [he/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月5日

help-circle
  • I think people on hexbear would not want to “defend the constitution” or be an “asset” to the most evil empire in history. It sucks to lose a job and a likely relatively stable one, but I think it comes off as sarcastic because this is a leftist site- I would guess lussy has no alegience to the constitution or the country.


  • I think the problem is that the thing the united states has done most successfully in its propaganda is to get its people to not pay attention to the world around them.

    I feel like people think of political strategies as a push and pull from left to right but even more prevalent in the west, where the spoils of global dominance are abundant, is a pull towards willful ignorance.

    In the US I am rarely frustrated by a right wing person who has bad takes about what’s happening- that is a very rare experience. The vast vast majority of people will never pick up a newspaper, read an article, or watch a video on the news. Most people get an inkling of major events by stumbling across them while browsing sports or their hobby on social media. And even then theyll peek in, internalize the first take they see that feels ok, then never peek again. My frustrations are with people who have no idea what’s going on and feel proud about not wanting to find out.

    The west is nowhere near a mass waking up because people are still going to their regular jobs, shopping at their regular stores, and hanging out with their regular friends. Change will have to come from outside of the west or things will have to get far worse here for far more people for anyone to be motivated to do something about something.

    While I agree that the us is a failed state and the west is in a kind of collapse, it’s hard to convince someone of that while they’re playing video games on their PS5 after eating out at a new chicken place that opened up at the end of their day sitting in a cubicle chatting with coworkers.









  • I’ll agree about the rigid format of movies but to say that’s why I think movies have the greatest impact on me of any media.

    A movie is a very tightly packaged combination of art forms that has to hit all the right brain pieces at all the right times because they have such a limited amount of space to do it in.

    The greatest movies are those that can keep you completely focused for two hours and affect you for days after. They are able to masterfully execute on all art forms at once.

    Even for great books I generally read them in multiple sittings which at least temporarily takes me out of their world. Games are an even greater collection of arts in that they also add an interactove element, but they’re often so long that I never quite get fully into the stories. I ran into a soft-lock in Disco Elyseum that caused me to have to re-load a save and redo some pieces. That experience isn’t too uncommon in gaming but it’s something that would never stand in a movie.

    Basically I think the greatest movies are those that manage to affect me so so much with such tight constraints.



  • The fundamental problem with your question is the perception that there are these prescribed stages of development and each stage is an advancement on the previous.

    Instead, the indigenous peoples in the world were just as “advanced” as the colonizers who slaughtered and enslaved them. They were not on different stages of a tech tree like in a game, they just developed different societies.

    So of course slavery was not necessary because there is no such thing as necessary advancement. Even if you argue that advancements in medicine requires more modern modes of production, places like Cuba or the Soviet Union skipped or sped through or skirted around or limitidly used Capitalism and still developed incredible health programs. So then capitalism isn’t even necessary for technological advancement in that way, let alone slavery.


  • Pretty much in my experience. I’m sure there were some people who worked with companies to help with DEI initiatives who were doing so in good faith, but ultimately the system doesn’t work in a way that would allow change.

    HR departments are naturally responsible for any diversity training and practices, but HR is beholden to the interests of executives and investors who don’t care at all.

    That’s why the only reason any inclusive practice is ever adopted is because of regulation or because companies think they can get an edge in marketing.

    It just makes chud whining even dumber because if they understood how the businesses they pretend to worship work then they’d know that these practices are just capitalism doing capitalism things, which they claim to support.


  • They’re not real. I’ve worked at multiple places with DEI initiatives. They amount to a yearly training where white people get to vent their bigotry and a position within HR devoted to focusing on more inclusive recruitment tactics.

    For the most part we still hired almost exclusively white people.

    In reality DEI was just a way for companies to pretend they’re cool places to work and DEI was dropped the moment it started getting backlash.







  • People have the ability to contexualize. Revolutions have been won by people who believe a god controls everything. They still found the motivation to act with a group of humans for their material needs.

    Your problem is one of priority. I agree these things aren’t material, but it truly matters so little. Astrologists still protest, christians still read marx.

    I think you should analyze why these specific beliefs cause you so much anger that you call your comrades on this forum idiots.