May be unpopular opinion but i dont mind sin companies from advertising, as long as they concede that people are able to talk about them in a healthy way.

Steven Caulker should absolutely be able to talk about gambling addiction while Bet365 is a sponsor, just like an alcoholic or religious person can say they dont drink with Heineken as a sponsor.

Rejecting something that exists in the world completely is unhealthy. You need to be able to talk about it. So if the rules of the game prevented any right for sin companies to react if somebody says something against them, im all for it.

Look, they got the decision correct fwiw. But this transparency just confirms the thing everyone knew. These lines are arbitrary af and the referee’s basically just yolo the decision

Is there a bet for which league can get away with the worst decisions?