Who the frell can’t get into Farscape?!

The main text kinda does

I disagree.

They’re asking based on their specs whether Linux will run fine for them.

The post does not ask that.

Your post doesn’t ask that.

If you have to ask someone else whether you should switch then you should not switch.

If you have to ask someone else whether you should switch then you should not switch.

On reflection, I realised my flippant joke may not have been well received. I apologise. I’ve deleted the comment.

British police aren’t right wing.

LOL

poor, defenseless, innocent women

Not doing yourself any favours with this kind of sarcastic comment.

Anyone who advocates for the disenfranchisement of trans people

I’ve never seen anybody argue that trans people should be denied the right to vote. Including in this article.

Yup

What’s the name of the package? I couldn’t find anything.

http://settrans.net/~rah/misc/Martin Butler - Corporeal Fantasy 005 (Suffering).webm

You are saying that Christianity actively opposes the virtues of Christianity, right.

No. You’re saying that followers of Christianity do not display Christian virtues. I’m saying therefore Christianity is having a negative impact on the spread of Christian virtues and so if your goal is to promote Christian virtues then promoting Christianity is working against your goals.

Did you read it?

Yes. Did you?

She doesn’t think Trans people, a part of the LGBT community, exist.

The article makes no mention of whether she views trans people as existing. Again, you’re jumping to conclusions. And to be frank, you’re being ridiculous.

You’ll never guess what the ‘T’ in LGBT stands for…

You’ll never guess what the ‘L’ in LGBT stands for…

She is actively seeking to drive a wedge between LGBT communities and the police

I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion given the article. You seem to be jumping to conclusions.

as well as trying to divide people in regards to LGBT issues

Again, I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion about her goals. The fact that she simply has a different opinion to others doesn’t imply a goal of dividing people. Dividing people may be a conseqeunce of her actions but that doesn’t imply it’s her goal.

She will happily cut off her nose to spite her face, if it means harming trans people.

Again, this is jumping to conclusions.

And being part of a community doesn’t make you immune from being against the community. … there’s homophobic/transphobic/biphobic people in the LGBT community

True but that doesn’t mean any particular person who is critical of one section of the community is necessarily against the whole community, that doesn’t follow.

there were Jews in Germany who hated Jews and happily supported Nazis

Firstly wow that took no time at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin’s_law

Secondly, this is a false equivalence. Every example you’ve given is of a member of a community being against the whole community but in the case we’re discussing, a member of a community is critical of only part of the community, not the whole community. And critically, it’s a part of the community that they’re not a member of.

The “sides” are the LGBT community and those that hate them.

This is wrong. The person who took Northumbria Police to court was a lesbian and hence a member of the LGBT community. It doesn’t make sense for the “sides” to include the LGBT community.

You’re conflating the gender supporting (as oppose to gender critical) community and the LGBT community.

Is there a client for Signal in Debian?

Paper abstract:

We propose a novel scenario in which scalar perturbations, which seed the large-scale structure of the universe, are generated without relying on a scalar field (the inflaton). In this framework, inflation is driven by a de Sitter space time, where tensor metric fluctuations (i.e., gravitational waves) naturally arise from quantum vacuum oscillations, and scalar fluctuations are generated via second-order tensor effects. We compute the power spectrum of such scalar fluctuations and show it to be consistent with near scale invariance. We derive the necessary conditions under which scalar perturbations become significant and much larger than the tensor modes, and we identify a natural mechanism to end inflation via a transition to a radiation-dominated phase. Our proposed mechanism could remove the need for a model-dependent scenario: the choice of a scalar field, as the inflaton, to drive inflation.

https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/vfny-pgc2

deleted by creator

I got these reusable cloths and they’ve saved me a packet

Just out of curiosity, what did these replace?

Finding the actual records/videos is not trivial, which is why I’m asking if anyone has already done that and can provide links.