Nur noch eine Überwachungsmaßnahme Brudi, dann wird’s bestimmt besser
Nur noch eine Überwachungsmaßnahme Brudi, dann wird’s bestimmt besser
I’m too terrified of dying to an irresponsible driver, so as much as I would like to bike everywhere, I’ll keep taking the metro for now. They’re adding more and more actually decent bike lanes so hopefully one day…
Why couldn’t they just serve the comments to each client with the ad-adjusted timestamps already? The only thing the client has to request then is the comment page it wants to load, and some unique ID for which the backend remembers which ad version it’s associated with.
I’m mostly just glad to be in a country where it is more socially acceptable to be direct. I would be a bit more formal than the original email, but the rewritten version seems really watered down and tip-toed in comparison.
I think that is changing through ChatGPT and the likes though, even it’s non-English output has a distinct American tone to it that I’m starting to see more in professional emails. I have seen too many literal translations of “I hope this message finds you well” already, it’s kinda ridiculous
I will say, for a mainstream US news outlet this article wasn’t as bad as I was expecting. Maybe just because there’s no way to spin this anymore, but then again some outlets will just parrot IDF statements as fact
Ooh good catch. That makes sense. Not sure I would call this beautiful, especially without any way to tell how much time has passed, but fair enough
That doesn’t make sense unless this was personal expenditure, which it doesn’t seem to be
But… from when? Surely expenditure hasn’t gone up linearly with time
…how did the line come about? How did they determine what the life expectancy would have been with less expenditure per capita?
Das sagst du, nachdem du in deiner Antwort mit keiner Silbe auf den OP Kommentar eingegangen bist und nur weiter über Parkplätze gemeckert hast? So wenig Selbstreflexion möchte ich auch haben
Man kann ja auch mit was anderem als dem Auto zu Besuch kommen.
Wenn es um etwas geht, mit dem die Liberalen sich identifizieren können: “Anreize schaffen!”
Wenn es um soziale Grundbedürfnisse geht: “Angebot und Nachfrage regeln den Preis!”
Ok, I like this description a lot actually, it’s a very quick and effective way to explain the effects of no backtracking. A lot of the answers here are either too reductive or too technical to actually make this behavior understandable to a layman. “It just predicts the next word” is easy to forget when the thing makes it so easy to be anthropomorphized subconsciously.
Inheritance is random
My favorite way to resolve method ambiguities.
Somehow Corrections gave a late night show parasocial vibes and I am here for it
Conveniently they are about to declare those the same thing
Ah right, and here I thought the point of the protest was calling for peace. Silly me!
For me it was the fact that the first sentence literally just spells out what the line above says. It feels like every other sentence coming from ChatGPT is just a summary of the previous sentence. (Unless it’s trying to relativize, then it hits you with the “it’s important to remember”.)
Eh, I mean it’s a very specific flavor of overexplaining and needlessly summarizing, I don’t think real ramblings (for lack of a better word) would exhibit this particular writing style purely by chance, even with repeated points.
This isn’t about responsibility, it’s about preventing suffering. If you could prevent a genocidal leader from being born, which you knew would save hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, why wouldn’t you? Because it’s that person’s “responsibility” that all of those innocent people died after all?