Great counter argument.

So just because there is something or someone worse we shouldn’t criticise others anymore or what are you implying?

subhuman

So now we’re openly using Nazi vocabulary as well?

Not only is the tattoo not just a Totenkopf, but Platner was well aware that it’s a Nazi symbol.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/24/politics/graham-platner-nazi-tattoo-evidence-kfile-invs

Does anybody care that Drop Site’s author and founder Ryan Grim supported Graham Platner, who has a skull-and-bones tattoo resembling the Nazi Schutzstaffel’s symbol. Grim also shared posts by Sulaiman Ahmed a friend of neo-nazi Nick Fuentes. And Drop Site recently outright posted right-wing Tucker Carlson as if he is a credible source for anything. Grim also interviewed Tim Dillon, who once dressed as an antisemitic caricature of a Jew that’s “controlling the media”.

This is actually quite a good read and pinpoints the issue. (Sorry for the Reddit-link though.) https://www.reddit.com/r/GrapheneOS/comments/1s8q534/response_to_a_post_about_grapheneos_on_another/

Having read the comments I still see two major isssues with this:

1. This looks like an almost-as-secure-as-GrapheneOS fork, therefore creating a (false) sense of security, because…
2. GrapheneOS’s security is based on secure hardware (Pixel’s Titan chip) to verify the software. Only having software security without the underlying secure hardware is kind of pointless or at least well… a false sense of security.

Officially yes, but I suspect he is still behind the official social media accounts. Their tone is unchanged and I recently got blocked by the GOS account on Bluesky and immediately by Micay’s account as well.

I think it’s a lot more than just 3 features removed. AFAIK the whole hardware attestation is based on the Titan chip and you don’t have to trust the devices hardware, because you can cryptographically prove that the software is unchanged. It’s not only about the Auditor app, but the whole integrity of the OS, the boot process and firmware is secured by the Pixel’s hardware or more specific the Titan chip.

And the billions of devices can not be saved by a GrapheneOS fork because they’re mostly missing crucial firmware and generally get no updates anymore. That’s why GrapheneOS is only supporting recent devices and especially Pixel devices because they receive up to 7 years updates.

I’m all into getting people a more secure OS but I fear that a GrapheneOS fork is perceived as a secure OS when it’s actually not. The most important security features are still recent (firmware) updates and hardware attestation, verified boot etc.

I would love to know, but he blocked me everywhere.

But those benefits rely on the Pixel’s hardware. This is contradictory.

Haben Leute in Göttingen gemacht:

https://www.sueddeutsche.de/jetzt/drogen/in-goettingen-spriesst-der-hanf-jzt.26395877946017346

But why?

Have you vibecoded this?

How are you accessing Jellyfin? Local only, via VPN and/or reverse proxy? Anything else you have changed on the system in general?

The whole repo is such a mess.

First it was the source code, than a Python rewrite and not it’s “Claw Code”. The issues are just AI spam. I’m really curious where this is going.

Thanks you!

That’s also not true and a vast simplification.

If people have a problem with Netanyahus far right government they should criticise and hate on him and his politics.

But modern antisemitism is a complex phenomenon and people project a lot of problems of modern capitalist society onto Israel, because it’s an easy target. Especially after Israel committed all the atrocities in Gaza.

Israel and or Netanyahu is not mainly responsible for the rise of antisemitism!

Bullshit. Fuck Netanyahu, but he’s not solely responsible for the rise of global antisemitism and neither is Zionism.

tl;dw He got a faulty unit.