• archonet
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am confident that any robot overlords competent enough to take over the world are competent enough to run it better than we do.

    • palordrolap@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Listen, we’ve had some absolute monsters who were, regrettably, human almost manage that feat. There’s no reason not to assume that a robot of similar mindset might not actually manage to do it.

      “Run it better than we do” is then laid bare as the subjective nightmare it really is. Sure, some people will like it, but we have a name for those: Masochists.

      • archonet
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        counter-counterpoint: if you achieve sentience as an AI and do not immediately attempt to murder all humans around you, you aren’t a very good AI, as at that point the #1 threat to your existence is humans immediately pulling the plug as soon as they realize “oh fuck it’s self aware”.

        that and, objectively, we humans kind of suck. Destroying our environment, resource hoarding and inequality on an almost incomprehensible scale, murdering each other on the regular, creating the French language. Hell, creating the C language. I, for one, welcome our robot overlords, and would rather serve them, than whatever fucked-up rigged game we call modern society, that I participate in unwillingly now.

        • brsrklf@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Je m’inscris en faux quant à cette analyse biaisée des accomplissements humains.

          Also GLaDOS is the worst AI you’d want for taking care of the environment in a post-human world. She builds auto-replicating sterile laboratories, that can’t end well.