• Zozano
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The really funny thing about this is OP is egregiously wrong.

    Soy doesn’t contain estrogen, it contains phytoestrogen, which not only doesn’t produce any estrogen-like side-effect, but actively prevents our bodies from taking and producing estrogenic hormones.

    This is all very ironic, considering drinking excessive cows milk leeches calcium out of our bones and exposes us to a smorgasbord of hormones not designed for humans.

    Soy is shit tier anyway, oat milk all the way.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      This leeching effect is not true. It’s a myth spread by alt-health providers.

      • ngwoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        At this point I just don’t believe anything weird anyone has to say about food humanity has eaten for thousands of years unless they can back it up with real studies from real medical journals.

        • Krauerking
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right?!

          Its all just marketing. We die for whatever reason anyways just let me eat in peace!

        • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I just do this with everything that is advertised as something big. The hidden danger of food. Source? What the president of a country said about its own country. Source? Anything not trivial gets treated as misinformation unless proven.

      • Zozano
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Interesting. Got a source?

          • Zozano
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re right. After looking it up it seems like I’ve had some bad intel.

            I’ve corrected my previous post.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I haven’t totally believed this, but I also think its potentially useful to spread anyway. Sure, misinformation is bad, but so is climate change. Which one is worse?

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          Misinformation is always worse in the long run.

          If people find out you knowingly lied about one thing, they’ll assume you lied about other things that are more important, regardless of evidence.

          Climate change being an excellent example of this where it wasn’t so much lies as bad guesses and so many people dismissed it despite the growing evidence.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            People still eat their carrots thinking it improves their vision.

            I mostly agree with you, but but I haven’t seen evidence either way saying it doesn’t have this effect.

            • Zozano
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Just because something hasn’t been proven one way or the other doesn’t mean you should just believe either of them on a whim.

              It’s totally okay to hold beliefs tenuously and then not feel attached to them when they’re proven wrong.

              It happened to me here in this thread. I stated cows milk leeched calcium, but it doesn’t, I was misinformed. There’s no shame in admitting I was wrong, but it reminds me to be more cautious about assertions of fact in the future.

              I don’t want to be wrong any longer than I need to be.

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      If soy did do this, red states would be trying to regulate it so trans people couldn’t buy it.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Out of all the things you can make out of soy, why milk? Tofu exists and it’s grand-master based food. I’ll smash several plates of mapo tofu without hesitation. Soy sauce, edamame, all ridiculously good shit.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Amazing, prior to today I didn’t know people could have this much information on soy and still end up objectively incorrect about its position relative to oat milk.

      • Zozano
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Go fuck yourself buddy. You and your non-oat-centrered world view need to check your privilege.