I’ve found that AI has done literally nothing to improve my life in any way and has really just caused endless frustrations. From the enshitification of journalism to ruining pretty much all tech support and customer service, what is the point of this shit?

I work on the Salesforce platform and now I have their dumbass account managers harassing my team to buy into their stupid AI customer service agents. Really, the only AI highlight that I have seen is the guy that made the tool to spam job applications to combat worthless AI job recruiters and HR tools.

  • Zozano
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    I use it when I get stoned with my mates and think of funny shit to generate.

      • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Why would you even comment if you don’t want to participate in a discussion?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Is this discussion? I added my answer onto the pile for OP’s question. I said I dislike a thing and everyone who uses it, never at any point expressing any uncertainty or confusion on the matter. Then user b said they use it and explained how. If anything they seemed to want to be insulted, and in that sense I was quite nice about it.

          • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Clearly, their intent was to provide an example of a relatively harmless use of AI as a way of demonstrating to you that your position may have been a bit reductive.

            Your reaction, of behaving like, lets be honest, a bit of an asshole, wasn’t really warranted.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              I tried really hard not to engage with this obvious bait but I guess you really want it.

              If you require AI to be amused while high then congratulations you’re the most disgruntled creature on the face of this earth. Too bad you’re still paying for a business sampling works without permission or accrediting authors.

              Shit counterpoint by a shit person.

              • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                First of all, most AI tools have some free tier. I doubt the other commenter paid a penny.

                Also, just because they did it, it doesn’t mean they “required” it… I’ve laughed at cat videos before, that doesn’t mean that I require cat videos to be amused.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  Whether or not there is a free tier the business profits from its use and you’re a part of that.

                  • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    20 days ago

                    It kind of depends on your perspective, I wouldn’t say they profit from it monetarily - they definitely make a significant loss in raw $ from free users, but there is some amount of beneficial optics for the company, if people use it for fun/harmless activity.

                    I think we both want the same thing. I don’t want to tone police you or any of that shit, and I believe you’re totally justified in how you feel about AI, but I really do hope you have a read of my comments from the perspective of someone who agrees with you rather than someone who is trying to pick a fight with you.

      • Zozano
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I meant to reply to you, to illustrate it’s not always unethical; a point you raised, not OP.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          It is always unethical and I made it very clear that people like you are people I dislike, so stop trolling and ragebait elsewhere.

          • Zozano
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            I’m not trolling. Why is it unethical for me and my buddies to generate images of a duck with the head of an elephant?

              • Zozano
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                For the sake of brevity, I’m just going to agree that I’m sea-lioning.

                Now, explain how what I’m doing is unethical.

                Do you think it’s unethical because it uses stolen art?

                If so, I don’t think there’s an issue because I’m not publishing anything I generate.

                Do you think it’s unethical because of the electricity usage?

                If so, you could make the argument about any frivilous activity which generates electricity.

                I really don’t know of a compelling reason besides these two which raises a red flag for you.