• archonet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the unfortunate reality is that animal fuckers are becoming more and more commonly accepted on the internet as a whole – and expressing any opinion to the contrary is likely to get angry dogfuckers ranting and raving in your inbox.

    tis a disturbing future we live in.

    • SteveXVII@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Furries and animal-fuckers are different groups. And if you’re lumping them together, you’re bound to get criticized for it.

      FYI: furries are people with an interest/love for anthropomorphic animals.

      • archonet
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        actually they’re not, but I forgive your mistake

        • SteveXVII@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Replying from an alt-account because the other instance doesn’t show your message.

          Could you explain how and why I am wrong?

          • archonet
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            much like how pedophiles will excuse jerking it to loli by justifying it with “no no, bro, she’s actually a 10,000 year old dragon goddess, she just looks 12!”, furries justify wanting to fuck a dog by saying the dog talks.

            It really is just that simple, sport. Fetishizing animals is not okay. And you can use all the mental gymnastics you want to bullshit yourself with so you can sleep at night, but at the end of the day, nobody else is obligated to indulge you in them.

            • SteveXVII@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Lets get something straight first before I disseminate your argument: I do not watch furry porn myself, I am a furry who enjoys sfw furry art and I’m trying to defend the community against false accusations like yours.

              Furry porn is based on fictional characters with fictional properties. What doesn’t exist in real can exist in fiction, like an anthropomorphic animal. If you want to see the difference between an anthropomorphic animal and a non-anthropomorphic animal you can compare the following two subs: !furry@pawb.social and !aww@lemmy.ml. Also, morality can get messy in the realm of fiction, take pokémon for example, it depicts animalfights organized by humans for their pleasure. Would it then be wrong to watch pokémon?

              And !furry@pawb.social proves that there is more to the furry community than furry porn, since the mahority of the posts are sfw, making your generalization false. Or take the exiatence of fursona’s, where people make an anthropomorphic version of themselves.

              And one last thing: even IF it was all an excuse to watch bestialityporn, even then the idea that all furries are animalfuckers is false. Because there is still a difference between watching certain drawn content and actually indulging in it in real life.