Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.

    Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.

    You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can’t counter their actual point.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whatever your reason for doubting CSIS is, dont attributed to me. You have plenty on your plate as it is without making up claims by others.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not the one doubting CSIS who made the report that China’s gallium restriction are a national security threat to US.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, if you read reports from more than one country, you might not blindly believe every headline you specifically search for.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m constantly questioning myself. That’s why it’s so easy for me to discredit your propaganda.

                    You might want to read the articles connected to some of those headlines you frantically copy and paste, and then look for corroborating verified articles from a different source. Yhen, come to your own conclusion that cannot be refuted according to the data you’ve gathered(stop making unverifiable claims that are so easily refuted is a good first step), and you might actually be able to make a coherent post!