• Kaea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you seriously compare socialism with opensource then I’m sorry for you.

    I’m huge advocate for opensource software and I can even say it’s my life passion and I really know how important the relation between capitalism and opensource is.

    You wouldn’t have react.js without capitalism. You know what is made in react.js? Mastodon

    They could have used different library for js. one made totally by volunteers, but they haven’t. Why? Capitalism and opensource provide reliable products because there is a money factor and it fuels development

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          When somebody thinks that something like react.js wouldn’t be possible without capitalism, you can only laugh or cry. If you really can’t understand that open source existed long before corps started messing with it, then you’re an utter ignoramus not worth having a discussion with.

          • Kaea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you understand what I have said. React.js would be possible without capitalism. But it is made by Facebook (capitalist company). And it must be a really reliable choice if Facebook and Mastodon decided to use it

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure what’s so special about react.js being made by a capitalist company. Saying that Mastodon uses a popular library that happened to come out from a commercial company is some kind of gotcha is frankly incoherent.