• Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I was curious and did a little reading. It seems mostly in name. Though Monarchies tend to have a dive right component where Dictatorships seem to more often arise from a coup d’etat.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I live in a monarchy (Sweden) but the King does not control the country, and there’s no religious component to his position. I would not consider us a dictatorship.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also as with most monarchs these days. They are no longer the seat of political power. I don’t think most people would consider Sweden to be ruled by a monarch.

        • rimpoe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Maybe the difference is parliament. A dictatorship will have advisors and may delegate limited control to other entities however they are the ‘final word’ and the only opinion that cannot be circumvented. Traditional monarchies would have also been dictatorships. Modern monarchies delegate significant power to parliament in manners that can’t be circumvented by their own will. So I’d say that the difference between a modern monarchy and a dictatorship is a democratically elected parliament that has power beyond the will of the monarch.