• stifle867@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    For those looking for a source, I looked into it and yes the source is the CCPs claims. We all know how trustworthy CCP statistics are.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07732-5

    According to the Chinese NFI, national forest coverage has increased by 2.15% in the 7th NFI and by 3.41% in the 8th NFI

    By contrast, the GFC dataset, which is considered to be more accurate than previous remote sensing datasets due to its unprecedented global high spatial resolution, showed that the change in forest area of China between 2000 and 2012 was a net loss of 38,743 km2, equivalent to a decline of 0.40% in national forest coverage

    Basically, satellite imagery seems to “strangely” conflict with CCP figures.

    • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That GFC study contradicts the many studies using both older datasets and newer datasets:

      CAS: https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/mutimedia_news/202203/t20220322_302792.shtml

      UNESCO: http://www.unesco-hist.org/index.php?r=en/article/info&id=1714

      Journal of Geophysical Research: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022JG007101

      Remote Sensing: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/13/2592

      International Journal of Remote Sensing: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431161.2021.2022804

      International Journal of Digital Earth: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2023.2190625

      In science, we call this “cherrypicking data.” Colloquially, we understand this to be because someone fucked their experimental validation. In the real world, we call this “disseminating misinformation.”

      global-scale data cannot reasonably represent changes in the regional land cover. Moreover, different studies may have different accuracies within the same region and even may reach opposite conclusions

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      8 months ago

      I love how every thread with positive news about China will have at least one chud who can’t even spell CPC properly bleat about statistics from China not being reliable. Get back in your basement.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        At least China is saying something is a good thing that I agree is a good thing. That’s progress of a sort.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          8 months ago

          Actually it’s the opposite. CPC is the actual name of the party, and CCP is the name brainwashed western idiots use for some weird reason. It’s like if I started insisting spelling USA as SUA and then acting like that makes sense. Anytime somebody uses CCP they expose themselves as an utter imbecile whose opinions can be safely ignored.

          • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Does it matter? It’s a translation of a foreign Language, and hardly anyone uses the real names of countries. They are usually longer and in languages you don’t speak.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, it does matter. There is an official translation from the party and there’s a made up one that edgelords in the west use for some reason.

              • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                CCP: Chinese Communist Party

                CPC: Communist Party of China

                They are basically the same and mean exactly the same thing. I don’t really see the issue.

                I don’t think it’s edgelords using it I think basically everyone does. It’s used because it’s used. You are making it sound like its an intentional psyop.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  United States of America and American United States is basically the same thing, we should just ignore what USA calls itself and use AUS instead. The question is why westerners choose to use a different name than the official one chosen by the party. Maybe you can enlighten us what the reason for doing this is.

                  • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    90% sure that is a rhetorical statement but I am going to try and answer it anyway.

                    It’s the same reason why a vaccume cleaner is called a hoover. A hoover is a vaccume cleaner. A vaccume cleaner is not always a hoover, yet loads of people call the floor sucker hoover no matter if the brand is a Hoover or not.

                    Nobody really care if someone says “I am getting the hoover” and pulls out a Dyson. Everyone was expecting some kind of floor sucker with maybe a select few expecting an actual Hoover.

                    You can ignore what the official name of the USA is. People already do that. They the USA America all the time already. AUS will be a little confusing at the start as many associate that with Australia but get enough people together to call the USA, the AUS instead and it’s not going to be wrong.

                    A good example of people not using the correct name of a country is the UK ain’t nobody using the full name the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland are they? The initialism is wrong too it should be UKGBNI

          • mintyfrog@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó (中華人民共和國) is the actual name of the country, why did you refer to it as China? “China” likely comes from poor translations of the Qin Dynasty.

            It’s been the CCP for years. Even in 2016, it was the CCP in the CCP’s own official translation of Xi Jinping’s speech. CCP can’t just rebrand because it got bad press and expect non-propagandized nations to go along with it.

            https://u.osu.edu/mclc/2023/04/06/ccp-or-cpc/