• zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Then your statement doesn’t make sense lol

    The rural/urban divide isn’t unique to China or India or Brazil. It’s everywhere. Drivers are always different across the urban/rural divide.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is the point. When you exclude that group of people only from 15 out of 32 surveyed countries, you skew the results for the whole survey. You can’t draw parallel conclusions from different samples.

      • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The goal of this comparison is to compare urban-to-urban, because those countries which don’t have this exclusion have relatively tiny rural populations.

        • Paragone@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Then it ISNT a

          “Global Happiness Index”

          , rather it is a

          “Global URBAN Happiness Index”,

          and such profound mislabeling of things is disinformation, not journalism.

          Which, itself, is so systematic & profound, nowadays, that there isn’t much hope for integrity to win, in our world, now, anyways.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That is the conclusion you have drawn, but it’s not part of the methodology listed in the survey. They haven’t excluded rural participants from the 17 countries, while explicitly excluding them from 15 countries. If you see no issue with that, enjoy your blinders, but please stop spreading misinformation.

          • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Rural populations are negligible and covered under other factors in a number of countries (in the US, Internet access). It’s not worth mentioning because it’s not a relevant part of data.