Bought this kingston xs2000 a while ago. It’s officially rated for “up to” 2000Mb\s read\write but slows to a crawl after 30GB have been copied. Fyi, I’m copying files from an internal nvme (samsung 980 pro) via a usb 3.0 cable, so this kingston ssd is the only bottleneck.

  • WhosMansIsThis@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think your problem is, at least in part, due to the fact that you’re connecting via usb. No matter how fast your drive is capable of going, your machine has to negotiate the read/write speeds based on the number of lanes available for the entire system.

    You can think of it like this: all of your usb ports share physical ‘data lanes’ that exist on your machines motherboard. These data lanes send information to and from your external device and the cpu. Additionally, most motherboard manufactuers hardwire various internal components into these data lanes as a way to save money without sacrificing hardware features. So now your external drive has to share a limited number of data lanes with all of your usb ports + anything else the manufacture decided to hardwire into.

    When you connect your usb device to your machine, the device tells your operating system ‘hey, I can do 100000 writes per second’ then your operating system takes a look at all of the data lanes and determines how many lanes it can allocate to the external device, responding with ‘ok. This system is very busy so I need you to do 200 writes per second instead of 100000’

    Generally, when people talk about how fast nvme is, it’s not because its just ‘better’ than everything else. It’s because its usually connected directly to the motherboard via m.2 slots. These m.2 slots usually (but not always) have dedicated data lanes to the cpu.

    I know this stuff can be confusing and manufactures make it worse with how they advertise their products but I hope this helps.

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I know how most of these things work, but thank you for the detailed description. Still, 30MB/s is unacceptable.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If USB was the bottleneck it would be 80MB/s. I get 80MB/s from my SD card over USB in my 11 year old PC.

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      USB-c is 10 gigabit. If it crawls after 30GB I’m guessing it’s likely counterfeit.

      • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        To be fair, it’s connected via a USB-A to USB-C cable. But that cable is rated for USB 3.0 speeds. The SSD was purchased from a reputable retailer in Germany, so I’m confident in it’s authenticity.