• Idliketothinkimsmart@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    According to compiled police data, only 2% of arrests result in convictions. If 2% of the burgers a cook made were edible, he’d have a very big problem on his hands.

    • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Considering the frequency of false convictions and the rate at which they are achieved by coercion I’d say it’s even worse than that.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Less actually. Engels described this in the “Conditions…”, even in the conditions of purposeful and pretty obvious starvation only a minority of victims turned to crime. Especially that back then, even being unemployed or homeless or too poor to live was literally a crime, as the poor law stipulated, punished by the forced labour camp.

        So really, this is the point of this survelliance system - not to prevent crime but to criminalise everyone. As old saying goes “there are no innocents, only people insufficiently interrogated”.

        EDIT: wrong person, i wanted to write this to @plinky@hexbear.net

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      But arresting people as a form of harassment is the burger. Having a cop roll up on a guy sitting on the curb and throwing him in the back of a squad car is the service Americans want.

      If anything, the low conviction rate is a problem only in so far as a court proceeding exists at all. Leave them all in jail forever, Gitmo style, and Burger Folk won’t complain.