• athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The photographer was Dorothea Lange.

    In early 1935, […] Lange began to work for the California State Emergency Relief Administration. That summer, the agency was transferred to the RA, which had recently begun a photodocumentary project to draw attention to the plight of the rural poor. (In 1937, the RA would become the Farm Security Administration, or FSA.) Lange worked for the FSA periodically between 1935 and 1939, primarily traveling around California, the Southwest, and the South to document the hardships of migrant farmers who had been driven west by the twin devastations of the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl.

    She’s the photographer who took the “Migrant Mother” series, some of the most iconic images of the Depression.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fucking pathetic then and it’s fucking pathetic now. Some of those shanty towns were real fuckin nice compared to our tent cities.

    Fucking pathetic, we could do better but instead humanity would rather be a selfish cunt

  • ElleChaise@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Holy cow, the wife looks hardly 25 years old. They really popped kids out back to back in them days. I guess it’s true you just believed in the Lord, had a bunch of young’uns, and hoped and prayed to Jesus Christ at least one of them made it to adulthood. Contrast that to the middle class lifestyle of many Americans just a little more than a decade later and it becomes even more of a mind-blower.

    • LuckyBoy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thats not the wife, the wife probably is in the back of the older teenager girl that you think that is the wife. You can see a foot.

    • neo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Two adults, four children, two dogs and they only carry a small suitcase and a bundle. Wild.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Remember that back then, we had far fewer vaccines, people got sick with terrible illnesses all the time. The Spanish flu had killed millions just a little less than 15 years prior. People also starved and died too. We didn’t have the complex supply chains that could deliver fresh foods around the world, either. We are incredibly lucky these days. We really do take it for granted.

      Smallpox, measles, polio, and other diseases were still in full swing.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is likely their one and only outfit but I can almost guarantee those are some durable fabrics, Dad’s clothes will still be in great condition for when their son fits them and thats one of the things people used to specifically look for when buying fabrics/clothes.

      The modern world of fast fashion couldn’t be more off an opposite.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    And right wingers would call them freeloaders and tell them to get a job

    They had nowhere to go, how are they going to get a job and there are many other factors why someone cannot work

    Also fuck capitalism, we should be free to live our lives and not be slaves to the capitalist system

    • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wonder how things were going in the USSR at this point in history. Surely everyone always had enough to eat and enjoyed freedom of movement.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Stalin was rubbing his hands together excitedly, about to send people into the meat grinder.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      You are free to live you life. Are there armed guards preventing you entering the forest and living off birds you kill with your hands and sleeping on pine needles? Be my guest.

      Or do you mean “we should be free to have farmers work for my food, and have 20 people come build me a house, all for free”?

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are there armed guards preventing you entering the forest and living off birds you kill with your hands and sleeping on pine needles?

        Well, yes, actually. Not without reason, but literally, yes. Typically some combination of public property, private property, and wildlife/safety regulations stop that from being a long-term solution. Depending on how far away from society you go, you can escape scrutiny for a time, but you’ll never be safe from the threat of the cops rolling in and destroying whatever you have and dragging you out for trespassing or violating public land ordinances.

          • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The people in this picture worked too, then the system collapsed due to rampant financial speculation and they were made destitute. Along with hundreds and thousands of others. People literally starved to death during this time.

            If your response to the idea that perhaps things could be better for the people who work and contribute labour for your stuff is “well if you don’t like it, go live in the wilderness”, you suck.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              Go farming. Grow your own food. Build your own house. Vote for a government that provides social services. Forage. Barter. Get a different job.

              There’s like a thousand solutions.

              • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Sorry, just go farming and build your own house? Do you think those things don’t have significant upfront costs that would be a barrier to people in precarious conditions?

                This is not a serious argument, it’s completely detached from the actual barriers people face in reality

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Really, those things have cost? Seriously? No way!

                  Next thing you’re going to tell me is that the people who already incurred in those costs (farmers, construction workers) want to earn money to cover those costs and their labor!!

                  What a scandal!

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol, even a fast peruse of my comment history will show you that even for European standards I’m quite progressive.

          Which might be why I demand fair compensation for hard working laborers, no matter what online edgelords think they are entitled to.

  • beatle@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Better dressed than most modern people with a home and employment.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      This was before fast fashion. Clothes were more expensive, but better made. You had far fewer pieces of clothing, and you’d repair them if they got worn, torn, loose seams, etc. The fact that there are five people carrying a small suitcase and a rolled-up pack between them suggests that most - if not all - of their clothes are on their backs.

      • plofi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yup, I’d take a larger suitcase on a vacation. Moving nowadays wouldn’t be possible without a vehicle.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s OK.

    In another year Daddy gets drafted and starts making money.

    A year after that he gets killed in WW2.

    And at the end of the war, all the Boomer children in this photo get rich and have keep all the money for themselves…