• worlds_okayest_mech_pilot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    The difference is that Bioshock, Saint’s Row, and Stalker are all actually good games.

    Ubisoft has no intention of churning out anything but hot garbage, so I’d rather my hot garbage look like Assassin’s Creed than Tom Clancy. I was busy playing Metal Gear Solid and Ace Combat anyway, so I just liked seeing the cool Assassin coats. Plus I’ll take “you fistfight the pope” over “the Russians and Chinese have teamed up to declare war on freedom because they’re evil.”

    Also, Unity is only a decent stealth game imo because it added a crouch button and actually tried to make the level layout promote stealth and hiding. I miss the AC era where they tried to put an emphasis on hiding in crowds and using distractions, even if it was complete dogshit because the games were ass.

    • ashinadash [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Idk, I like Bioshock as a setting and for dunking on Ayn Rand, but as a game it’s kind of an offensively poor facsimile of the first System shock =)

      They used to make good games though, like I enjoyed the reboot Prince of Persias and all, but Assassin’s Creed kind of layed the groundwork for their open world trash era. I’d also rather have a game that looks like Chaos Theory or Double Agent than the first Assassin’s Creed’s goofy blue filter all over it. AC does at least have better politics than a chud shooter, and I can appreciate some Fuck The Church sentiment.

      Crouch was so desperately needed, why did that take them so long? I really liked Unity’s big crowds that would panic and disperse, it felt like more of a challenge than just hiring courtesans or monks in AC 1 or 2. I really felt that Unity is the only time they did any of this right, and then they ditched it a year later because lol