Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post, thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • zogwarg@awful.systemsEnglish
    10Ā·
    7 months ago

    A choice selection of musks deposition with TurdRationalistā„¢ adjacent brainrot shibboleths:

    Q: (By Mr. Bankston) And this quote says from the Isaacson book, ā€œMy tweets are like Niagara Falls sometimes and they come too fast,ā€ Musk says. ā€œJust dip a cup in there and try to avoid the random turds.ā€ Do you think thatā€™s an accurate quotation from you?

    A: (By Elon) That is acutally not ā€“ not accurate. [ā€¦] The things that I see on twitter, not the [ā€¦] posts that I make are like Niagara Falls. [ā€¦] my account is the most interacted with in the world I believe. It is physically impossible for, you know, any one person to see all of the interactions that happen. So the only way I can really gauge the interactions is by sampling them essentially.

    Q: Got you. So would it be fair to say that Isaacson made a mistake here and what thus really should say is not my tweets are like Niagara Falls, but everyone elseā€™s tweets are like Niagara Falls?

    A: Not exactly. It means [ā€¦] all of what I see when I use the X app, [ā€¦] all the posts that I see and all the interactions that happen with those posts, are far to numerous [ā€¦] for any human being to consume.

    Q: Okay. So when this quote talks about random turds; these are other peopleā€™s random turds?

    A: I mean I suppose I ā€“ I could be guilty of a random turd too, but [ā€¦] what Iā€™m really referring to is that the only way for me to actually get an understanding of what is happening on the system is to sample it. Like try to do ā€“ just like in statistics, you donā€™t ā€“ you do ā€“ try to do ā€“ you sample a distribution in order to understand whatā€™s going on, but you cannot look at every single data point.

    I can only gauge truth from first principled anecdotal sampling of my nazi friends, I canā€™t look at everything alas, Iā€™ll leave community notes to deal with pesky liberals

    [Which btw in other parts of the deposition he says, for a community note to be surfaced people must vote the same note as being helpful, where they previously disagreed, which doesnā€™t sound at all like it couldnā€™t be gamed, and doesnā€™t at all sound like it would sometimes force ā€œcentrismā€ with nazis]

    On a all too sadly self-aware note

    Elon: I may of done more to financially impair the company than to help it.

    You think?