Most sophisticated Isra*li propagandist

  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I really think you ought to watch that video before continuing to support the US in its completely unnecessary and indefensible slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      As a Chinese person who’s lived in Japan for many years and read about the topic pretty extensively in three languages, I don’t think that I need my opinions to be validated by an Englishman.

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        He makes a very extensively researched and rigorously sourced case that the dropping of the nuclear bombs served no practical purpose regarding the war and that, furthermore, those responsible knew it served no such purpose.

        Your position is identical to the modern, western narrative which was cooked up as a retroactive justification for an obviously unjustifiable act.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I am not watching a 2 hour long video. If you would like to summarize his most salient points then I am happy to respond to those points. If me not watching this video is a deal breaker for you then we do not have to continue this conversation.

          Your position is identical to the modern, western narrative which was cooked up as a retroactive justification for an obviously unjustifiable act.

          I would be interested in these western sources which use the saving of Chinese and Korean lives as an explicit justification for the atomic bombings.

          Also, your position is also the position of the Nanjing-denying Japanese far right so… Idk where that leaves us if we apply your reasoning.

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              This is applying post facto knowledge to a decision when assessing it ethically. Even if the Japanese had planned to surrender following the Soviet invasion (there is no evidence that any such decision was made before the atomic bombings) such decision was not communicated to any of the Allied powers. Even if an intention to surrender had been teased at, a surrender is not a surrender until the surrendering side accepte terms and lays down arms.

              Even if we accept for sake of argument that the US decision makers thought the bombs had zero military value and were purely for show, how do you think it would have gone down if the US had went to Stalin with this information? Stalin, the man who had been pushing for intensified Allied air raids against Germany and a second front since 1941, would have just been like “oh don’t worry about using your new city destroying wonder weapon, I’ll just let Soviet soldiers continue to fight and die in a war you could probably end easily”?

              It always comes down to this. Chinese lives don’t matter, Korean lives don’t matter, Soviet lives don’t matter. As long as the precious Fascist civilians get to starve to death instead of being bombed, or conscripted into a kamikaze mission, or shot for dissenting instead, it’s aaaaaalllll worth it!

              • Antisocial_Socialist [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think you should probably take the L on this one. It’s very widely known that Japan was on the brink of surrender to the Soviets before they were nuked and any justification of nuking a civilian population center is pretty fucked up.

                • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Sorry. I forgot that as a Ch*k it is my place to bite my tongue and just accept my people being butchered and raped on a daily basis while the Japanese fascists debate surrender at a leisurely pace. I shouldnt hope for Japanese morale to be destroyed in a way irrefutable to all but the most insane Japanese militarists (the ones who tried to coup their own God-Emperor to prevent surrender) because that would be downright uppity of me.

                  Just come right out and say it. Chinese lives don’t matter. Maybe after that you can go lecture the Palestinians about how firing rockets at Tel Aviv is bad and wrong because precious Israeli civilians might get hurt.

                  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Sorry. I forgot that as a Ch*k it is my place to bite my tongue and just accept my people being butchered and raped on a daily basis while the Japanese fascists debate surrender at a leisurely pace.

                    Holy fuck dude this is way over the line I get that this is an issue that is personal to you but justifying nuclear annihilation of civilians and then getting defensive and racist jacketing an admin is totally unreasonable. I think you need to step back and chill out.

                    I normally really like you but this is not the hill you wanna die on I guarantee it.

                  • theres a big difference between Palestine and the US. one is a people facing a genocide engaging in resistance (resistance that is far less violent than the terror isntreal engages in), and one is a great power that used the most powerful weapon ever created to attack two densely populated civilian centers, while the government of Japan was drafting terms of surrender. the horrific crimes of the imperial japanese military does not justify the mass murder of civilians. israeli settlers arent civilians, they are engaging in settler terrorism

              • This is applying post facto knowledge to a decision when assessing it ethically.

                to some extent, sure, but top US military officers believed that Japan was on the verge of surrender and I doubt they kept this to themselves

                It always comes down to this. Chinese lives don’t matter, Korean lives don’t matter, Soviet lives don’t matter. As long as the precious Fascist civilians get to starve to death instead of being bombed, or conscripted into a kamikaze mission, or shot for dissenting instead, it’s aaaaaalllll worth it!

                they weren’t “Fascist civilians”, they were civilians in a fascist country; this was intentional mass murder of civilians, not just accidental casualties caused by attacks on military targets