• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    At a stated $330,000 per mile, there are almost assuredly better measures than this dollar for dollar in most places. This makes sense in a city as comically car-dependent as Dallas and in such a hot climate, but realistically, that $330,000 could be better spent elsewhere toward fighting temperatures if a city actually wanted to do something about city temperatures and global warming as a whole.

    It’s just that those things would involve actually improving the city to the detriment of NIMBY drivers.