sicko-wistful

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    cake
    OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Techbros and bazinga defeatists are "firmly in the “inventing new ones” category. Even in your example, they are acting as if the new technology is some all powerful, inevitable, unstoppable force from above so they may as well worship it cheer on this technological progress. They have essentially in a way, reinvented the concept of God.

    I lost count of how many people I’ve met that saw “progress” as some Civ game style bar that only crawled upward toward specific goal milestones. A lot of inevitabilists seem to see dae le singularity or even FALGSC as inevitabilities, and even otherwise self-described leftists can convince themselves that they just got to sit and wait for that progress bar to fill up and everything to just change in a way that suits them (while rhetorically shitting on people for being “afraid” or “emotional” for not sharing their toxic positivity).

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I lost count of how many people I’ve met that saw “progress” as some Civ game style bar that only crawled upward toward specific goal milestones.

      As much as I love the series, Civilization has done irreparable harm to the public’s understanding of history and how technology develops. People seriously think you can just invent saddles for horseback riding even if you’re in a place without horses. G*mers are going to need serious re-education after the revolution.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        cake
        OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I still can’t get over Civ II having a “corruption” stat that only appears around the time communism is invented, but if you switch to “democracy” the corruption stat is nullified. pete

        • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          The series is still stuck in the '90s. Belief in the End of History, Great Man, and so on. The least they could do is look into more systemic analysis and archeological discoveries involving our prehistoric ancestors.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            cake
            OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Even the typical “science victory” ideology is propaganda, unexamined ideology that only feeds into my-hero grifts. Go to other planet, plant flag, win, roll credits, show score.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                cake
                OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                One of my dearest childhood dreams and wishes was to explore the stars.

                Watching that dream get monetized and monopolized by techbro manchildren trying to sell that dream back to me was crushing to watch over the years.

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ahh the idealistic idea that change/adjustment/progress is both inevitable and always positive. You’re going to hate me for this, but Samir Amin had something to say about that too.

      The fact that these adjustments can be positive or negative argues in favor of an interpretation of historical materialism based on the concept of “under-determination.” I mean by this that each of the various levels of reality (economic, political, ideological) contains its own internal logic, and because of this the complementary nature of their evolution, which is necessary to ensure the overall coherence of a system, does not define in advance a given direction for a particular evolution.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        cake
        OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The fact that these adjustments can be positive or negative argues in favor of an interpretation of historical materialism based on the concept of “under-determination.” I mean by this that each of the various levels of reality (economic, political, ideological) contains its own internal logic, and because of this the complementary nature of their evolution, which is necessary to ensure the overall coherence of a system, does not define in advance a given direction for a particular evolution.

        That resonates hard with me, especially after being told how I’m against the inevitabilist’s personal idea of “materialism” if I don’t agree that the latest hype wave of consumer products and worker exploitation is different this time and will revolutionize the world in a way that will totally trickle down this time for real.

        I don’t just mean treat printers. Before that I got “materialist” sophistry about internet funny money, and even a brief but fierce moment where dar le VR/AR was the revolutionary hotness.

        • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          and even a brief but fierce moment where dar le VR/AR was the revolutionary hotness.

          The fact that we’ve gone through multiple phases of this in the last decade is extraordinary. First it was Oculus, then Google cardboard/daydream, then Oculus gain, then the Meta quest headsets, and finally Apple vision pro. Everytime it comes up, people are sure that this time VR will go mainstream! Maybe it’s time to accept that as social creatures, humans do not want to live with a headset strapped to their face 24/7. Hell, even when we had to cover our faces for a good cause and public benefit, like masking for a pandemic, people invented the most juvenile of excuses to not wear a mask.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            cake
            OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The fact that we’ve gone through multiple phases of this in the last decade is extraordinary. First it was Oculus, then Google cardboard/daydream, then Oculus gain, then the Meta quest headsets, and finally Apple vision pro. Everytime it comes up, people are sure that this time VR will go mainstream! Maybe it’s time to accept that as social creatures, humans do not want to live with a headset strapped to their face 24/7. Hell, even when we had to cover our faces for a good cause and public benefit, like masking for a pandemic, people invented the most juvenile of excuses to not wear a mask.

            Maybe one of the incarnations of “Glassholes” will finally stick around someday soon, but for now I’m enjoying the reprieve from even more socially normalized surveillance and creepshot-enjoying.