• yrmp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    My theory as someone from Appalachia is that she’s a left leaning centrist trying to bring class consciousness back to the coal mining areas (y’know, where they shot their bosses in literal battles to establish worker unions previously), but she also depends on those local economies to get resources to do this and has to play both sides.

    She’s made it her life’s mission to improve the education and literacy rate of the region and has to appear homey and down to earth to the folks living in the south as she doesn’t want to compromise her image. She says things in a vague enough way to not be accused of being a dirty lefty commie (their words, not mine).

    I don’t think you deserve pushback, just offering an alternative explanation.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yup. She wants to help her people and the most effective way of doing it is by educating the kids.

      Giving books to children is a super effective way to spend the money. They can educate themselves out of the hole.

      It’s actually really subversive. Smart lady. She plays the game quite well. She can’t take an open liberal stance as she would be marginalized, but educating children is difficult to attack.

      I have no doubt that she’s a closeted liberal in the south. It’s often how you have to be to survive.