• bigbrowncommie69 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    The assumption is that Sims 5 would be better and not worse in every way. They could do the exact same things again but five times worse.

    Hell all this time they could have been working to fix the main issues with it.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      The assumption is that Sims 5 would be better

      I’d call it a hope more than an assumption. We know they can make good sims games because they made 2 and 3, so it sucks to see that they decided to stop making games and just forever-develop the one that was bad.

      • CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        We know they can make good sims games because they made 2 and 3

        You see, that’s kind of a problem right there. Game companies are like the ship of theseus. The people and, more importantly, the teams who made Sims 2 and 3 are not there any more.

    • bumpusoot [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sims 4 is already just bad, it’s core mechanics suck and DLC will never fix that. Sims 5 may or may not be good, but it’s a chance at least.