• seejur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Reminder that when it was Napoleon “defending” (battles vs the coalitions), he absolutely handled Emperor Alexander (Russia) ass in the field. See Austerlitz

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah people seem to think nuclear powers cannot lose wars. Afghanistan, Vietnam and several other countries would like to chime in.

      Look nuclear escalation is a theoretical option, bit in practice it’s a lot harder than people think. And now with the recent sarmat test, war on Russian soil, the broad attacks on Russian infrastructure, gigantic losses and Russia relying on north Korea for production of artillery shells… Russia looks weaker than ever.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Look nuclear escalation is a theoretical option, bit in practice it’s a lot harder than people think.

        For two reasons in this case.

        1. Russia knows that the wind can blow radioactive ash across their border.

        2. Putin has grandchildren and dictators want legacies.

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The other people in Putin’s administration also have their own families and interests and wouldn’t want that put at risk by nuclear annihilation. Even if Putin himself tried to give the go-ahead, I doubt those in charge of the nukes would want to effectively commit suicide over Putin’s stupid invasion by firing them.