Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1743arrow-down19cross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1734arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square112fedilinkcross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
minus-squareChanchoManco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 hours agoMaybe they used an AI service to upscale the otherwise small res picture instead of looking for the original ones.
minus-squareKrauerkinglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoInteresting. I think that does seem like a legit way to get stuff that looks like this.
minus-squarezalgotext@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoGuys, you’re thinking about this way too hard. Pictures like this have been floating around the Internet for decades. It’s not fancy ai downscaling or any sort of fingers, they’ve just been JPEGed into oblivion
minus-squareKrauerkinglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoYeah but I have JPEG’d a photo a lot and never seen the text get that swirly. It feels purposeful. But, never ascribe malice when the more likely answer is stupidity. You are probably right.
Maybe they used an AI service to upscale the otherwise small res picture instead of looking for the original ones.
Interesting. I think that does seem like a legit way to get stuff that looks like this.
Guys, you’re thinking about this way too hard. Pictures like this have been floating around the Internet for decades. It’s not fancy ai downscaling or any sort of fingers, they’ve just been JPEGed into oblivion
Yeah but I have JPEG’d a photo a lot and never seen the text get that swirly. It feels purposeful.
But, never ascribe malice when the more likely answer is stupidity. You are probably right.