• Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Try harder please. I have read several articles posted by OP. They clearly have an agenda and have engaged in a lot of trolling behavior.

      So the question is having an active troll/propagandist really good for the community. Maybe you could argue that they generate engagement or that we need to protect people’s right to disagree.

      The community should carefully weigh this moving forward. If accounts that act like bots are allowed then this place will follow in the footsteps of Digg or Reddit.

      Personally, I would have already set them straight as a moderator. I have never been impressed by edgy people who add very little to the conversation.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The mods and admins have actually discussed their account multiple times.

        The consensus is, yes, they have shitty opinions, but having shitty opinions is not against the TOS.

        The links they post are legitimate links from respected sources.

        So, no, nothing bannable or removable here. The comments and downvotes do their job exposing just how shitty their opinions are.

      • darharrison@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think actively trolling people by arguing in bad faith or through astroturfing like this is definitely poisoning the community. It shouldn’t be tolerated for tolerances’ sake. And I’m not saying to just ban people you don’t agree with. I’m saying people who obviously just post to poke the bear, so to speak, should face discipline for trying to turn Lemmy toxic.