• merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    He’s sorta right that Nukes have been the one way a lot of these smaller/geopolitically vulnerable countries have been able to protect themselves.

    Libya gave up nukes then gets shit on by NATO, whilst DPRK is able to fend off the modern era US coup bullshit through nuclear proliferation.

    US-Israel is desperate to retain the nuclear monopoly in west Asia exactly because it allows Israeli-US forces to move around the area with impunity. Nukes are the ultimate force multiplier in that regard.

    As long as nukes exist, they create the conditions for owning them in a circular fashion, because without nuclear weapons you suddenly have no way to deter a conventional invasion beyond a conventional army; And that only works insofar that your neighbours are militarily weaker than you.


    That all being said, Ukraine has no route to creating a nuclear weapon beyond a dirty bomb, which even for a NATO proxy would (pun unintended) blow up in their faces spectacularly. All this rhetoric does is heighten Russian nuclear posturing and increase the rate of Russian advances along the front.