The Wetʼsuwetʼen are a First Nation who live on the Bulkley River and around Burns Lake, Broman Lake, and François Lake in the northwestern Central Interior of British Columbia.

They speak Witsuwitʼen, a dialect of the Babine-Witsuwitʼen language which, like its sister language Carrier, is a member of the Athabaskan family.

Their oral history, called kungax, recounts that their ancestral village, Dizkle or Dzilke, once stood upstream from the Bulkley Canyon. This cluster of cedar houses on both sides of the river is said to have been abandoned because of an omen of impending disaster. The exact location of the village has been lost. The neighbouring Gitxsan people of the Hazelton area have a similar tale, though the village in their version is named Dimlahamid (Temlahan)

The endonym Wetʼsuwetʼen means “People of the Wa Dzun Kwuh River (Bulkley River)”

The Wet’suwet’en First Nation was formerly part of the Omineca Band. However, in 1984 the Omineca Band split into the Broman Lake and Nee-Tahi-Buhn bands. The Skin Tayi band later split off from Nee-Tahi-Buhn. Today, the Skin Tyee Band, Nee Tahi Buhn Band, Wet’suwet’en First Nation, Moricetown Band and Hagwilget Band make up the Wet’suwet’en Nation.

Like most First Nations here, Wet’suwet’en never signed treaties with the Canadian or provincial governments. Nevertheless, the latter took the land and leased forested acreage to logging companies. Today just 20% of British Columbia’s old-growth forests remain.

In 2020, after decades of activist pressure, the province identified about a quarter of the remaining old growth as at high risk for logging and recommended a pause while deciding their fate. Yet today, logging has been deferred in less than half of the high-risk area.

Another conflict with the settler state has been the Coastal GasLink pipeline, which seeks to transport liquefied natural gas from northeast BC to a terminal on the coast near the town of Kitimat.

The 670-kilometre (417-mile) pipeline will cut across traditional Wet’suwet’en lands that cover 22,000sq km across northern BC.

The hereditary chiefs, who under Wet’suwet’en law claim authority over those traditional territories, said they never gave their consent for the project to move forward. They have raised concerns about the pipeline’s potential effects on the land, water, and their community.

In late July, Amnesty International took the extraordinary step in naming Dsta’hyl Canada’s first ever designated prisoner of conscience, and now demanding his immediate and unconditional release.

“The Canadian state has unjustly criminalized and confined Chief Dsta’hyl for defending the land and rights of the Wet’suwet’en people,” Amnesty International’s Ana Piquer stated in a press release. “As a result, Canada joins the shameful list of countries where prisoners of conscience remain under house arrest or behind bars.”

In October 2021, Dsta’hyl was arrested and charged with criminal contempt after confiscating and decommissioning heavy equipment utilized by Coastal GasLink to construct its LNG pipeline on unceded Wet’suwet’en territory. Dsta’hyl said he was enforcing Wet’suwet’en laws as the company did not have the free, prior and informed consent of hereditary chiefs to build the pipeline.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you were buying a house (or being forced to buy a house by a partner who will murder someone if she has to live within 100ft of another human being for another year) would you rather have:

    1. a house that is built this year and seems to have been competently constructed (no D R Horton bullshit) and is literally perfect inside, so spacious, amazing kitchen, more rooms than you need and they’re all so big and nice, and the crawl space is so big and clean you WALK IN and think it’s an unfinished basement

    BUT it’s got a small yard, and the entire lot is sloped. It doesn’t look like it would be an issue with drainage and water damage, but the yard isn’t very usable for yard stuff. Your partner listens to you talk about building a massive retaining wall and filling it in with dirt to level it off like you’re a crazy person

    OR

    1. A house that was built last century and has numerous points of jankiness, some of which are known and some you might not know until after buying the property, and because it’s basically in a forested lot (trees so thick there’s no grass) it’s BUG CITY like I’m talking 4-5 huge spiders living in every window. And a tree is leaning towards the house

    BUT the yard is HUGE like you can’t even see the back of the property line. Even though it’s all forested. It’s also slightly cheaper than the brand new house, but also has stuff like: access to an unused septic tank (it’s on public utilities) next to it, and an oil tank for heating that needs like EPA bullshit to remove

    Please tell me your preference in the comments

    • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      if the one with the big yard is further from the nearest busy road definitely that one. loud fast cars are my biggest annoyance in most of the places I’ve lived.

    • peppersky [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Unless the yard is like unusably tiny I’d take the first one. If you put the effort in you can work with the slope and built a terrace and stuff into it

    • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Go with the big yard.

      To me the most important part of a home is whether I can have a veggie garden or not. Neither sounds ideal for that purpose but if some of the trees can be cleared without consulting local government you wont run out of space or things to do. Slopes are kind of nice to garden on because terraces are cool but space is more important. Try to find out if there have been any smelters or industry in the area that might have left lead or other stuff in the soil. That could be important. and check for distance from major road ways because tire dust is a serious carcinogen.

      A nice house is only going to encourage you to stay inside. Personally I don’t trust newly constructed building. Enshitification has been happening in construction for a while. I dont think there has been any advancements in home construction in 50 years other than how to build them cheaper and make the look like they are worth more. The jank of a old house is unlikely to be existential. The walls in the old house are likely going to be better at absorbing sound.

      If there is a possibility you are going to have children the big yard with trees is going to be really good for them.